"exhibits the character NNNLimiNsIGA Text of the Document Transmitting the Hawaiian Treaty. _ POSITION OF GOVERNMENT. Plan of the Annexation Regarded Merely as an Inevitable Consummation—Sec- retary Sherman’s Report—Eng- lish Papers Nettlcd. Washington, June 18,—The following is the full text of the message sent to the senate by President McKinley to accompany the Hawaiian treaty: To the Senate of the United States: I transmit herewith to the senate, in order that after due consideration the constitutional function of advice and consent may be exercised by_that body, a. treaty for the annexation of the re— public of Hawaii to the United States, signed in this capital by the plenipoten- tiaries of the parties on the 16th of June inst. For the better understanding of the subject I transmit in addition a. report 'of the secretary of state briefly review— ing the negotiation which has led to this important result. The incorporation of the Hawaiian Islands into the body politic of the United States is the necessary and fit- ting sequel to the chain of events which from a very early period of our history has controlled the intercourse and pre- scribed the association of the United States and the Hawaiian Islands. The predominance of American interests in that neighboring territory was first as- serted in 1820 by sending to the'islands a representative agent of the United States. It found further expression by the signature of a treaty of friendship, commerce and navigation with the king in 1826, the first international compact negotiated by Hawaii. How England Backed Down. It was signally announced in 1843, when the intervention of the United States caused the British government to disavow the seizure of the Sandwich Islands by a British naval commander and to recognize them by treaty as an independent state, renouncing forever any purpose of annexing the islands or exerting a protectorate over them. In 1851 the cession of the Hawaiian king- dom to the United States was formally offered. and, although not then accept- ed, this government proclaimed its duty to preserve alike the honor and dignity of the United States and the safety of government of the Hawaiian Islands. From this time until the out- break of the war in 1861 the policy of the United States toward Hawaii and of the Hawaiian sovereign toward the United States was exemplified by con- tinued negotiations for annexation or for a reserved commercial union. The latter alternative was at length accom- plished by the reciprocity treaty of 1875, the provisions of which were re- newed and expanded by the convention of 1884, embracing the perpetual cession to the United States of the harbor of Pearl river, in the island of Oahu. In 1888 a proposal for the joint guarantee of the neutrality of the Hawaiian Is- lands by the United States, Germany and Great Britain was declined on the announced ground that the relation of the United States to the islands was sufficient for the end in View. In brief, from 1820 to 189?. the course of the United Statcs toward the Hawaiian Ts- lands has consistently favored their au- tonomous welfare, with the exclusion of all foreign influence, save our own, to the extent of upholding eventual an— nexation as the necessary outcome of that policy. "No New Scheme.” Not only is the union of the Hawaiian territory to the United States no new scheme, but it is the inevitable conse- quence of the relation steadfastly main— tained with that mid-Pacific domain for three—quarters of a century. Its ac- complishment, despite successive de- nials and postponements, has been merely a question of time. While its failure in 1893 may not be a cause of congratulation, it is certainly a proof of the disinterestedness of the United States, the delay of four years having abundantly sufficed to establish the right and the ability of the republic of Hawaii to enter as a sovereign con- tractant upon a ' conventional union with the United States,‘ thus realizing a purpose held by the Hawaiian people and proclaimed by successive Hawaiian governments through some 70 years of their virtual dependence upon the benevolent protection of the United States. Under such circumstances an- nexation is not a change; it is a con- summation. The report for the secretary of state and course of the recent negotiation and the features of the treaty itself. The organic and administrative details of incorporation are necessarily left to the wisdom of the congress, and I cannot doubt, when the function of the constitutional treaty making power shall have been accom- plished. the duty of the national legis- lature in the case will be performed with the largest regard for the interests of this rich insular domain and for the welfare of the inhabitants thereof. WILLIAM M'KINLEY. Secretary Sherman’s Report. Accompanying the message was a re- port from Secretary Sherman, which is as follows: The President: The undersigned, secretary of state, has the honor to lay before the president for submission to the senate, should it be deemed for the public interest to do so, a treaty signed in the city of Washington on the 16th inst. by the undersigned and by the duly empowered representative of the republic of Hawaii, whereby the is- lands constituting the said republic and all their dependencies are fully and abso- lutely ceded to the United States of Amer- ica forever. It does not seem necessary to the present purpose of the undersigned to review the incident of 1893, when a sim- ilar treaty of cession was signed on Feb. 14 and submitted to the senate, being sub— sequently withdrawn by the president on the 9th of March following. The negotia— tion which has culminated in the treaty now submitted has not been a mere re- sumption of the negotiation of 18:13, but was initiated and has been conducted upon independent lines. Then an abrupt revo- lutionary movement had brought about the dethronement of the late queen and set up instead of the theretofore titular monarchy a provisional government for the control and management ,of public af- fairs and the protection of the public peace. such government to exist only un- til terms of union with the United States should have been negotiated and agreed upon. The Republic of Hawaii. Thus self constituted, its promoters claimed for it only a de facto existence until the purpose of annexation in which it took rise should be accomplished. As time passed and the plan of union with ~Advertise in THE GAZETTE. WEE-any - NOB WAL-li. - oazn'r'ru. the United States became an uncertain contingency, the organization of the Ha- waiian commonwealth underwent neces- sary changes, the temporary character of its first government gave place to a permanent scheme under a constitution framed by the representatives of the electors of the islands; administration b an executive council not chosen by su - frage, but self appointed, was succeeded by an elective and parliamentary regime, and the ability of the new government to hold as the republic of Hawaii an inde- pendent place in the family of sovereign states, preserving order at home and ful— filling international obligations abroad, has been put to the proof. Recognized by the powers of the earth. sending and receivmg envoys, enforcing respect for the law and maintaining peace within its island bor- ders, Hawaii sends to the United States, not a commission representing a success— ful revolution, but the accredited pleni~ potentiaries of a constituted and firmly established sovereign state. However suf- ficient may have been the authority. of the commissioners with whom the United States government treated in 1893, and however satisfied the president may then have been of their power to offer the do- main of the Hawaiian Islands to the Unit- ed States, the fact remains that what they then tendered was a territory rather than an established government, a coun- try whose administration had been cast down by a bloodless but complete revo- lution and a community in a state of po- litical transition. A Responsible Government Now. Now, however, the republic of Hawaii approaches the United States as an equal and points for its authority to that pro- vision of article 32 of the constitution promulgated July 24, 1894, whereby the president. with the approval of the cabinet, is hereby expressly authorized and empowered to make a treaty of po- litical or commercial union between the republic of Hawaii and the United States Of America, subject to the ratification of the senate. The present negotiation is, therefore, as has been said, not a mere renewal of the tender of Hawaiian territory made in 1893, but has responded to the purpose de- clared in the Hawaiian constitution, and the. conferences of the plenipotentiaries have been directed to weighing the ad- vantages of the political and the commer- cial union alternatively proposed and rel- atively considering the scope and extent thereof. It soon appeared to the negotia- tors that a purely commercial union on the lines of the German zollverein could not satisfy the problems of administra— tion in Hawaii and of the political asso- ciation between the islands and the Unit- ed States. Such a commercial union would on the one hand deprive the Ha- waiian government of its chief source. of reven e from customs duties by placmg Its ter tory in a relation of free exchange with the territory of the United States, its main market of purchase and supply, while on the other hand it would entail upon Hawaii the maintenance of an inter- nal revenue system on a par with that of the. United States or else involve the or- ganization of a corresponding branch of our revenue service within a foreign juris- diction. \Ve have had with Hawaii since 1.75 a treaty of commercial union which practically assimilates the two territories with regard to many of their most impor- tant productions and excludes other na- tions from enjoyment of its privileges. yet, although that. treaty has outlived other less favored reciprocity schemes, its permanency has at times been gravely imperiled. Under such circumstances to enter upon the radical experiment of a complete commercial union between Ha- waii and the United States as independ- ently sovereign without assurance of per— manency and with perpetual subjection to the vicissitudes of public sentiment in tl'tie two countries was not to be thought. 0 . Annexation the Only Solution. Turning then to the various practical forms of political union. the several phases of a protectorate, an offensive and defen- sive alliance and a national guarantee. were passed in review. In all of these the independence of the subordinated state is the distinguishing feature, and with it the assumption by the paramount state of responsibility without domain. The disparity of the relative interests and the distance separating the two countries could not fail tO render any form of pro- tectivc association either unduly burden- some or illusory in its benefits, so far as the protecting state is concerned, while any attempt to counteract this by tribu- tary dependence or a measure of suzerain control would be a retrograde movement toward a feudal or colonial establishment alike inexpedient and incompatible with our national policy. There remained, therefore. the annexa- tion of the islands and their absorption into the political system of the United States as the only solutions~ satisfying all, the given conditions and promising per- manency and mutual benefit. The present treaty has been framed on that basis, thus substantially reverting to the orig- inal proposal of 1893, and necessarily adopting many of the features of that arrangement. As to most of these, the negotiators have been constrained and limited by the constitutional powers of the government of the United States. As in previous instances when the United States has acquired territory by treaty, it has been necessary to reserve all the or- ganic provisions for the action of con- gress. If this was requisitg in the case of the transfer to the United fates of a part of the domain of a titular sovereign, as in the cession of Louisiana by France, of Florida by Spain or of Alaska by Russia, it is the more requisite when the act is not cession, but union, involving the com- plete incorporation of an alien sovereignty into the body politic of the United States. The Only Precedent. For this the only precedent of our polit- ical history is found in the uncompleted treaty concluded durin President Grant‘s administration, Nov. 2. 1869, for the an- nexation of the Dominican republic to the United States. Following that example, the treaty now signed by the plenipoten- tiaries of the United States and the re-' public of Hawaii reserves to the congress of the United States the determination of all questions affecting the form of gov- ernment of the annexed territory, the cit- izenship and elective franchise of its in- habitants and the manner in which the laws of the United States are to be ex- tended to the islands. In order that this independence of the congress shall be complete and unques- tionable and pursuant to the recognized doctrine of public law that treaties expire with the independent life of the contract- ing state there has been introduced out of abundant caution an express proviso for the determination of all treaties here— tofore concluded by Hawaii with foreign nations and the extension to the islands of the treaties of the United States. This leaves congress free to deal with such es- txzcial regulation of the contract labor system of the islands as circumstances may require. The Temporary Government. There being no general provision of ex- isting statutes to prescribe the form of government for newly incorporated terri- tory, it was necessary to stipulate, as in the Dominican precedent, for continuing the existing machinery of government and laws in the Hawaiian Islands until provision shall be made by law for the government as a territory of the United States of the domain thus incorporated into the Union, but having in view the peculiar status created in Hawaii by laws enacted in execution of treaties hereto- fore concluded between Hawaii and other countries only such Hawaiian laws are thus provisionally continued as shall not be incompatible with the constitution or the laws of the United States or with the provisions of this treaty“ It will be no- ticed that express stipulation is made pro~ hibiting the coming of Chinese laborers from the Hawaiian Islands to any other part of our national territory. This pr0~ vision was proper and necessary, in view of the Chinese exclusion acts. and it be hooved the negotiators to see to it that this treaty, which in turn is to become in due constitutional course a supreme law of the land, shall not alter or amend ex- isting law in this most important regard. Respectfully submitted. _ JOHN SHERMAN, Secretary of State. The treaty ,which accompanies the report is practically identical with that already published. ENGLISH OPINION. The Globe Regrets That Great Britain Did Not Seize the Islands. London, June 18.—The Globe in an editorial discussing the Hawaiian an- nexation treaty, in which a. good deal of anger is displayed, says: "The American navy is absolutely un- fit to protect the islands, which would —Advertise in THE GAZETTE. _" g lie at the mercy of any Spanish war- ships appearing at Honolulu, while Japan’s sea power is so immeasurably superior to that of the United States that a Japanese naval demonstration would place President McKinley in a. difficult and perilous position.” The Globe further says that it thinks that the declaration made by Marquis Ito, the former Japanese premier, that Iapan had never entertained an idea of a. conflict with the United States over Hawaii contains between the lines an underlying feeling of keen resentment, and proceeds to say: “W'hatever course Japan may follow Great Britain claims that all her rights and privileges shall be scrupulously re- spected. Viewing the great strategic value of the group to England, it is a matter of regret that the islands were not added to the British empire long ago, and there was all the more reason to anticipate a prompt and watchful attitude on the part of Lord Salisbury, who should have remembered what a flabby appearance England presented before a contemptuous world in the case of Venezuela. No English ministry can afford to repeat that ofte" ' d bury should stiffen his ' , McKinley plainly that Great Brit claims the right to be consulted befor. the matter of annexation is decided." The foregoing recalls the fact that The Globe has been consistent in its :lamors that England shall annex everything; that it opposes coercion of the sultan upon the ground that Eng- land has nothing to gain by it, and that it favors England’s permanent and ab— solute ownership of Egypt and war for the annexation of the Transvaal. LAWN MOWERS! PHILADELPHIA and FAVORITE, liar- den Tools, Rubber Hose, Wire Oloih, Window Screens, Screen Doors, Oil Stoves, Mixed Paints. Lubricating Oil for Lawn Mowers and Mow- ing Machines, 500 per o'al. H. H. WILLIAMS. Schullze’s Market. 5 RAILROAD PLAOE AllD X X x X WASHINGTON ST. BRIDGE X x X Here Are a Row of Our Bargains for This week: Shoulder Steak, 3 Bound Steak, 12’: Lamb Chops, 10c Stew Lamb. '50 Plate Rib, Fresh or C orned,3 Ac rarsn nsn or ALL-KINDS. BluezFish and Weak Fish are es- pecially nice just now, and, prices are way down. Paul Schultze, Jr Fairlield Oouniy llalional Bank‘ 44 Wall St., Norwalk,_ Conn. INCORPORATED. 1824. Capital, 250 000 EDWIN O. KEEun; President. DAVID B. MILLER, Vice-President, L. C. GREEN. Cashier. EDWIN O. KEELER, Mossss H. GLOVER, DAVID B. MILLER, A. J. IVIEEKER. F. ST. JOHN Locxwoon. THEODORE E. 8111111, IRA COLE, CHAS. F..'1‘RIs'rnAM. Accounts of Manufacturers, Merchants and Individuals solicited. Safe Deposit Boxes ice to IIGIBOITTOIS. t‘ENTRAL NATIONAL BAN 26 WALL ST., NORWALK, CURPORATED SEPT. 1. 1876. CAPITAL. - - - - - $100.00I GEORGE M. HOLMES. President. E. L. BOYEB, Vice-President. WILLIAM A. Courts. ashier _ DIRECTORS: ' GEORGE M. HOLMES. y P. L. CUNNINGHAM. E. L. Roma, H. E. DANN. J T. PBOWIT'I S. H. HOLMES, J.Cons1Ns. J a. Ulscouni Day. Saturday. .L__.soH001 NOW OPE . ALL APPLICATIONS For admission shotl made at Hillside, l Mrs. MEANS... TlIE SILK AND DRESS GOODS HOIISE BOSTON 3 one SHIRT WAIST AID SIIIT E I PO II I II I. * NOBWALK. CONN. we $75.00 Bicycle given away Saturday night, June 19th,189'7. Save your duplicate checks. BENNETIIIN [IF STIIIIK IAIN. The weather has been against us, our stocks are large al this dale. PROFITS BEAR LITTLE WEIGHT. We must gel our slooks down, and The way Io do ii, is Io give bargains. Here are some of them: DOMESTIC GOODS. I Case of Summer domet flannel, 6c is the price, this sale price, 3. I Bale heavy unbleached muslin, 6c is the price, this sale price, 4. 1 Case 4=4 full bleached muslin, 7c is the price, this sale price, 5. WASH GOODS. 390 All Linen Batiste with Coloredl stripes, 19. 25c Organdies, I2 I=2 25c Lappet Lawns, 12 i=2 7:: Colored “ 4 190 White and Blk. India Linens, 10 A great stock White Dotted Swiss. SUIT ROOM. Jackets at Half Price. Capes at Half Price. Crash Skirts, $1.25. Duck Skirts, 98c. P’k. Skirts, $1.49. Covert Bicycle Skirt, $1.49. Linen “ “ $1.75. Linen Crash Suits, $3.75 to 5.75. Shirt Waists, 50, 75, 98, $1.25, $1.25 $.149 and $1.98. Ladies’ Suits, $5.75, $6.50, $9.98, $1 I,= ’ 98, $14.98. Separate Skirts, $1.25 $2.50, $2.75 to $10. ” UNDERWEAR DEPARTMENT. Ladies’ Undervests I2 2 Gents’ Undershirts: 25, 35:11:21.50‘3. gems, lzeglig-e Shirts, 50c. ens 0 ored Per and $1.50. cale Shirts, 75 1.00 Boys’ Shirt waists, 25 and 501:. Boys’ Blouses, 25 and 50c. Boys’ Knee Pants, 50 and 691:. Boys’ Wash Pants, 25 and 50c. 100 Dozen Ladies’ Neckties, all the latest colors, 251:. Ladies’ Wash Ties, 10c. Men’s Madras Shirts, 69. DRESS GOODS. Silk Stripe Chaille, 19c. 54 in. Blk. Sicilian, 50c. 54 in. all Checks, 75c. 36 in. W001 Mixture, 25c. 36 in. Mixed Suitings, 12 1=2c. SILKS. 27 in. Blk. Duchesse, 98c, this worth $1.50. 24 in. Blk. Rhadame, 75c. Summer Silk, 25, 33, 39 and 50. Large figure India Silk in black, 691:. 100 styles for silk shirt waists. SAVE YOUR DUPLICATE CHECKS AND WIN ' THE WHEEL! BOSTON STORE, , CORNER MAIN AND WALL STREETS, N ORWALK, GT. INSURE YOUR PLATE ‘GLASS IN I THE Mutual Plate Glass Insurance company “0F CONNECTICUTfi At HALF THE RATE charged by other stock companies Hi BYENTGNEQN. N ORWALK W. Room 1, GAZETTE BUILDINII