orig.” ‘ - N WAL PUBEIsEEEETEETHT'UESEAY—II—OEN—ING'Ev A. H. BYINGTON & CO., II AT Two DOLLARS TEE ANNUMHNADVA CE. g. gaming Egtwayspa, gonna in final gain and gamma. (neutral guardians, gamma, - game, gamma, antacid, tan-cannons in lflflfl. NUMBER 741--NEW SERIES. NORWAL‘K, CONN., TUESDAY, MARCH 18,1862. VOLUME XLV--N UMBER ll. fl NORWALK GAZETTE. OFFICE IN GAZETTE BUILDING. A.H.BYINGTON & CO., , A. H. BYINGTON, J. B. ELLs, G. N. ELLS. Subscription Rates . All Subscribers by Carrier, Mail, Post Riders and Wagoners, per year 2 00 Those living out of any Carrier’s District, if paid one year in advance, Clubs of six or more sent to one address, to be paid in advance, Single copies 4 cents. 150 , Advertising Rates. )nc Square, one insertion, ‘ ‘ two insertions, three insertions, one month, two months, three months, “ six months, “ one year—with paper Two S uares, one year—with paper, Each a dltional, Square, per year, One half column, one year, One Column, one year, 75 00 cell lines, or 100 w0rds,make a square. Fraction- al arts of a square char ed for as a whole. Year y advertisers have t e privilege of changing their advertisements once per month. Advertise- ments changed oftener charged as transient. Yearly advertisements payable 1st of January do July. Yearly advertisers restricted to the business contem- plated at the time of contract. Cards, Resolutions, Funeral and all other Special No- t cos, 25 per cent. additional on thehabove. These terms will be inflexibly adhered to. a CI-JAOOHHH?‘ H 2% 888888861888 ob Om BUSINESS DIRECTORY. Norwalk rest Dace. NAILS CLOSE- . West 7.30 A. M.——2.30 P. M. East 8.30 A: FIX—55.00 P. M. Danbury & Nurwalk Railroad 8.50 A. M. Weston, Bedding and Bedding Ridge, ’l‘ues- days, Thursdays and Saturdays, at 12 M. MAILS DUE. West 9.10 A. M.—6.00 P. M. East 8.20 A. M.—-3.30 P. M. Danbury dc Norwalk Railroad 8.00 A. M. POST OFFICE HOURS. From 7.00 A. M. to 8.00 P. M. . CHARLES OLMSTEAD, P. M. NOW HARDWARE &. PAINT STORE, Main Street, Opposite I. H: Campell’s Confectionery, mum .& PROWITT, Wholesale and retail Dealers in Hardware, Cutlery, Paints, Oils, Glass, Paper Hang- ings, Window Shades, &c. ROOFING SLATE, I'rdm Vermont, VERY CHEAP, At South ‘Norwalk by I H. E. WING. TEE ALLIs HOUSE, (formerly Union House,) New Haven, Conn. L. P. ALLIS, PROPRIETOR. 1". A. MOSMAN, M. 3., Homeopathic Physician do Surgeon. Ofilce over C. T. Cornwall’s Store, first buil- N0 COMiliionerretum3.—pu221°8 the will; ding east of Norwalk Hotel, NORWALK, CONN. References .- Prof. J. Beakley, Dean of the Faculty, Prof. S. R. Kirby, Homeopathic Medical Col- lege, New York city, or G. W. Swazey, M. D., Springfield, Mass. 21 JAMES G. HARBOUR, SURGICAL AND MECHANICAL ‘D I: N '1' I s '1', Chloe at Residence, East Avenue, Norwalk, Connecticut. Architecture. 3138!! M. STONE, . ARCHITECT, Will furnish Plans, Specifications, Detail Drawings, and superintcnd the 'erection of public and private buildings. Office in Mar- ble Block, Chapel-st, New Haven, Ct. “52 EO. F. BELDEN, Norwalk, Conn.,Man- ' ufacturer of Tin, Copper, and Sheet Iron Ware; and dealer in Stoves, Ranges, Furnaces, Cutlery, Brittannia, Wooden and Willow Ware, Crockery; and a full assort- ment of House Keeping articles generally. E. BISSELL, Auctioneer, will give 0 particular attention to sales by Auc- tion, of Real Estate, Personal Property and. Household Furniture : terms low. into. C. STREET & co, Importers; wholesale and retail dealers in HARDWARE, IRON, Steel Cutlery, Guns, Agricultural Imple- ments, Oils, Paints, Window Glass, 850. o. s. noonwoon, Fashionable Draper & Tailor, and GENTLEMEN’S FURNISHIN G EMPOBIUM 1 No. 3 Skiddy‘s Block, Main-st, Norwalk, Ct. S. E. (“INSTEAD 61.00., Wholesale and Retail Dealers in Groceries, Flour, Peed, &c., 14 and 16 Main-st, Norwalk, Conn. ETNA INSURANCE comraur, 01' Hartford. Incorporated in 1819, Charter Perpetual. Cash Capital $1,000,000 Insure against loss and damage by Fire, on Terms adapted to the hazard,and consistent with the laws of compensation. GEORGE R. COWLES, Sole Agent us For Norwalk and vicinity. New Meat Market. THE Subscriber would respectfully inform the public that he has REMO VED HIS STAND to Curtis’ Building, Main Street, and tends keepino' constantly on hand the ch01- cest of Beef, Pork, Mutton, Poultry, &c.,_ &c. Having had long experience in the busmess heis confident of his ability to please. A share of the public patrongfe is respectfully solicited. JA ES BYXBEE. Norwalk, Nov 5th, 1861. tf5 I noorrrvc. THE subscriber is prepared to furnish par- ties, building, with Warren’s superior FEZI AND CEMENT ROOFING. This article of Roofing is in use upon the Norwalk Lock Company's Building, and at Ironnsbury, Bisscll 8: 00's, where it gives en- tire satisfaction, and is believ d to be the cheapest as well as the best ro:..iug in-use.— Anorders will receive prompt attention. 0. F LOOMIS. Mr. Tennyson, and ,the late Prince Albert. A new edition of the “ Idyls of the King,” just published in London, contains the following dedi-‘ cation: “ There to his memory—since he held them dear, Per-chance as finding there unconsciously Some image of himself—I dedicate, I dedicate, I conse crate with tears— These Idyls. I I . g “ And, indeed, he seems to me Scarce other than my own ideal knight, ‘ Who reverenced his conscience as his king : Whose glory was redressing human wrong ; Who loved one only, and who clave to her’—- Her—over all her realms of their last isle, Cummingled with the gloom of imminent war, The shadow of his loss moved like eclipse. [gone; Darkeniug the world. We have lost him ; he is We know him now; all narrow jealousies Are silent ; and we see him as he moved. How modest. kindly, all accomplished, wise, With what sublime repression himself, And in what limits, and how tenderly; Not swaying to this faction or to that; Not making his high place the lawless perch 0f wing'd ambitions, nor a vantage ground For pleasure; but thro’ all this tract of years Wearing the white flowers of a blameless life, Before a thousand peering littlenesscs, In that fierce light which beats upon a throne, And blackens every blot ; for where is he Who dares foreshadow for an only son A'lovelier life, a more unstain'd than his 7 Or how should England, dreaming of his sons, Hope more for these than some inheritance Of such a life, a heart, a mind as thine, ‘ Thou noble Father of her Kings to be, Laborious for her people and her poor- VOice in the rich dawn of an ampler day- ‘Far-sighted summoner of war and waste To fruitful strifes and-rivalries of peace— Sweet nature gilded by the gracious gleam 0! letters, dear to Science, dear to Art, Dear to thy land and ours—a Prince indeed, Beyond all titles, and a household name, Hereafter, through all times, Albert the Good. “Break not, 0 w'oman’s heart. but still endure; Break not, for thou art Royal, but endure, , Remembering all the beauty of that star Which shown so close beside thee, that ye made One light together, but has past and left The Crown a lonely splendor. ' “- “ May all love—- His love, unseen but felt—o‘erohadow thee; The love of all thy sons encompass thee, The love of all thy daughters cherish thee, The love of all thy people comfort thee, Till God‘s love set thee at his side again.” «0». ’ J of Davis’s Soliloqny . To run, or not to run, that is the question ! Whether ’twere safer in the end, to endu re The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune ; Or with stol’n arms against a sea of Yankees Try, by valor, to end them ? To run ;—to rule No more ;—and, by escape, to say wo end The reproach, and the thousand natural shocks Which treason‘s heir to,—’tis a consummation Devontly to he wished. To flee; to vamosc ;— To vamofe! perchance be caught; ay, there’s ‘the ru ,— For in such case .what retribution ’d come, When we had thought to escape McClellan’s coil Must give us pause! That's the consideration That makes rebellion of so long life ; For who would hear the whips and scorns of men, Opposite N. Y. do N. H. Depot, in Union-st, The “Natalee “HON and Wile" Poltroonery. The reproach pf deceived and ruined countrymen, The insolenco of Foot, and the spurns That loyal citizens of the traitor take When he himselfmight his departure make [bear 0n shank’s mare ? who would defeats and dishonor And grunt, and sweat under a reign of terror But that the dread of something horrible In, that uncertain country, from whose hours And makes as rather hear those ills we have Than fly to others that we know not of 1 Thus treason does make cowards of us-all ; And thus the native hue of resolution Is sicklied o’er with the pale cast of fear And schemes of great pith and promise e'en With Beauregard, their councils turn away, And lose the name ofaction. WM. SanEerAnE. —-;€’ouran t. «O ; A True Man. Such was our friend. Famed on the good old A ;true and brave and downright honest man! Ho blew no trumpet in the market-place, Nor in the church, with hypocritic face, Supplied with cant the lack of Christian grace; Loathing pretence, he did with cheerful will What others talked of while their hands were still 1 And while “Lord, Lord 1” the pious tyrants cried, Who, in the poor, their Master crucified, His daily prayer, for better understood, In acts than words, was simply doing good. So calm, so constant was his rectitude, That by his loss alone we know its warth, And feel how true a man has walked with us on earthl . ll'lzittier. plan, ~‘Qb. From the N. H. Uour'zer. The Triumph of Armor. America has solved the naval problem about which the maritime nations of Europe have been speculating for the past two years, and established the fact that iron ships are hereafter to rule. the waves. By one sudden dash American genius has sprung upon the success . which has baffled the slowly moving the- crisis of Great Britain, and in one hun- dred days, with no preliminary prepara- tion or experiments, we have placed in actual service the most efi'cctive armor clad war vessel in the world. We have tested her strength against, and proved her superiority to, another armor-clad vesseluthe offspring of nine months American Rebel skill, and we have the proud satisfaction of victory. Not only does this romance of a sea-fight in Hamp- ton roads establish the supremacy of iron- clad vessels, bnt itutterly demoralizes all the ideasof seamanship and ship-building. Almost every principle of construction and arrangement as applied to the Moni- tor is novel and untried, ;and that they should be so successful is most reasona- ble. Instead of ships we have sent to sea a revolving fort, only twenty-one feet iii diameter, and proof against any shot yet inventedf A round tower sails through the water, presenting a small and impenetrable target to an enemy’s balls, and with but two guns defeats and drives away a mammoth 0. iron armor, which with her steel prow, her twenty guns, and her thoroughly covered decks, has wrought the destruction of two of the finest of our old style of war vessels. It was a great achievement—a won- derful contest, which recalls the old en- counters of Knights in armor. All hon- or to the ingenuity which planned, the skill which executed, and the confidence which sustained and perfected this great triumph over old nations and traditional predjudices. It is gratifying to our lo- cal pride that N cw Haven had so large a share in the honor, and Mr. C. S. Bushnell, who so perseveriugl y insisted upon the opportunity being given to Mr. Ericsson, and who, with his associates, assumed all the pecuniary risk, and to Mr. Thomas R. Rowland, the builder of the vessel and the suggester of many val- uable improvements, the country owes a debt of gratitude. The following description of the Muni- tor will explain. the peculiar principles on which she is constructed : She ish long, wide and flat-bottomed vessel, with vertical 'sides and pointed ends, requiring but a very shallow depth of water to float in, though heavily laden with impregnable armor on her sides and bomb-proof deck, on which is placed a shot proof revolving turret, which con- tains two very heavy guns. She is so low in the water as to afford no target for an enemy and everything and every- body are belnw the water line, with the exception of the persons working the guns, who are protected by the shot proof turret. The sides of the vessel are first formed of plate iron, half an inch thick, outside Of which .is attached solid white oak twenty-six inches thick, outside of this again is rolled iron armor five in- ches thick. The bomb-proof deck is sup- pOrted by heavy braced oak beams,upon which is laid planking seven inches thick, covered with rolled plate iron one inch thick. The turret consists of a rolled plate iron skeleton, one inch thick, to which are rivetted two thicknesses of one inch each, of rolled iron plates. Outside of this again are six plates of rolled iron, all firmly bolted together with nuts inside,so that if a plate is started it can be at once tightened again. The top is covered with a bomb-proof'roof perforated with holes. The lower part of the gun car- riages consist of solid wrought iron beams. These are planed perfectly true and are placed parallel in the turret,both of the guns pointing in the same direc- tion. The ports through the sides of the turret are only large enough to permit the muzzle of the gun to be thrust thro’. Inside of them are wrought iron pendu- lums, which close them against the enemy as soon as the gun recoils. She is armed with two of the Dahlgren guns, made to revolve by a pair of steam engines placed beneath the deck. The lower vessel is of iron, one half inch thick, and made in the usual man- ner. She carrries her machinery, coal, &c., aft, and forward, the ofiicer‘s guar- ters, ammunition and stores. The two partitions of the vessels are separated by a wrought iron bulkhead. The ofiicers’ quarters are very roomy and handsome, and are ventilated and lightened by Open- iugs from the deck. Her machinery consists of two hori- zontal tabular boilers, containing three thousand square feet of fire surface, and two horizontal condensing engines of forty inch diameter of cylinder and twenty-two inch stroke of piston. The propeller is nine feet in diameter, and sixteen feet stroke. It has four blades. The following is a table of the size of the difl'erent portions of the vessel : Feet. Inches. Length of upper vessel, 172 .— Beam of upper vessel, 41 4 Depth of upper vessel, 5 -— Length of lower vessel, 124 —— Beam of lower vessel at junc. with upper, 34 -~— Beam at bottom, ‘18 —— Depth of lower vessel, 6 —— Diameter of turret, interior, 20 — Height of turret, 9 —— Diameter of pilot house, 6 —- Height above deck, 5 —— The pilot house is only a few feet above the deck, the helmsman standing on a platform below it. l'his, with the turret, are the only things above the surface of the deck. It will be interesting in this connection. to see what results have been elaborated by our British neighbors in their long and repeated experiments with iron-clad vessels. We find in an exchange the following extract from the London Engi- neer, giving an account of the trial of a vessel armed with iron plates four and a half inches in thickness, and subjected to solid shot from the Armstrong and Whit- worth rifled cannon. The Engineer says :— On the first day four shots. were fired at 400 yards distance, with Armstrong eighty-pounders, and each broke the plating so as to expose the inner lining of wood The fifth shot did notpenetrate ; the sixth wag a bolt of puddled steel weighing eighty-eight pounds; it pene- trated the plate and passed in a slanting direction to an upper deck beam, where it was broken into 'several pieces. Ton shots were fired at this distance, two of which missed, but all the others broke the outer plates, yet did little damage to the interior lining. On the second day’s firing, the distance 200 yards, with an Armstrong one hun- dred pound iron conical bolt for the three first shots. The first started a plate half an inch at one end ; the second fractured a plate the whole of its length ; the third struck a joint and passed completely through the plates, opening the joints three-fourths of an inch. The fourth was a bolt of homogeneous metal, (fine steel) weighing eighty pounds. It struck the started joint of the plate,passed through it, struck an iron knee, tore it away, and drove a piece of the iron plate into the water on the Opposite side. The next shot was a one hundred pound belt of homogeneous metal. It forudin apiece of plate nineteen inches long and seven- teen inches broad, to a depth of eight and one half inches. They either broke or greatly damaged the plates, but the inner planking of oak, twenty-five inches thick, was little injured. _ Only four shots were fired by ,Whit- worth’s gun. Each bolt was formed‘of homogenous metal, hexagonal in form, flat headed, and weighing seventy-nine pounds. The first passed through the iron-plating four and one half inches thick and buried itself eleven inches Wltlllll the wood behind. The second passed through both the plating and the thick timber lining inside, carried away part of an iron knee, and drove a piece of the outer pla- ting half way across the ship. The third shot passed through one of the ports; the fourth cracked a plate, pierced it, and destroyed port of the upper deck water way, but it did not enter into the ship. It was found that the second shot of the Whitworth cannon, which was the only one which penetrated into the inside of the ship,passed through part of a plate that was unsOuud, andthe wood through which it entered was also , defective.— Whitworth’s cannon bad the greatest penetrating p0wcr. ' From these experiments, with the most powerful rifled guns and solid shot, at 200 yards distance, four and one half of wood,.afi'orded immunity from danger to those on board, although the plates were greatly injured by the firing. ————o«.» Fremont’s Hundred Days in Missouri. SPEECH 0F HON. S. COLFAX 0f Indiana, in reply to Mr. Blair of Missou- ri, in the House of Remesentatz'ces, March 7th, 1802. The House then went into Committee of the Whole on the State of the Union the bill regulating the franking privilege being nominally under consideration. . Mr. Blair, of Missouri, (Rep.,) pro- ceeded to speak of the Military Depart- ment of the West under Gen John 0. Fremont. Mr. Blair said a very great pressure had been brought to bear through the neWSpapers to force Gen. Fremont back into a command, and to force the Administration against its judgment, ex- pressed after delibertion, to employ him’ in some one of the military departments. He (Blair) had seen it stated in telegrams that Gen. Fremont had again and again demanded a trial. This is not true. Mr. Riddle, of Ohio, (Rep.,) asked on what authority the gentleman made the last statement? Mr Blair,resuming, said : No demand for ati-ial has been made, unless it has been done within the last two or three days. Gen. Fremont had not madé the demand at all, for he (Blair) had taken pains to satisfy himself of the fact by in- quiry at the office of the Adjutant-Gener- al and at that of the Judge Advocate of the army. It was most extraordinary that an officer of the army, charged with crime, mutiny and misconduct of the war and deposed from his command in conse- quence of these charges, should not ask a trial. He ventured the assertion that if Gen. Fremont will demand a trial, the Administration will grant it. It had also been heralded that the Committee on the Conduct of the War had demanded his (Fremont’s) restoration. He (Blair) undertook to say that such was not‘the. fact. It Was simply a publication of some of Fromont’s partisans, and it was also said through the Press that Fremont was to be restored to a command. He (Blair) did not know whether this was so or not, but inasmuch as this informa- tion came in somewhat the shape of other publications, he believed it was of the same character. There were preliminary symptons which foreshadowed and an- nounced the simultaneous appearance of the statement made by Gen. Fremont in his defence before the Committee, and the speech of his aid-de-camp (Shanks) in this House. The statement and the speech inaugurate a new campaign and a new field, and the battle is to be fought with weapons for different than the rude instru- ments of war—with proclamations, which up to this time, in Goa. Fremont’s hands have had no serious effect. He (Blair) commended Gen. Fremont’s choice of weapons. Certain it was that his proc- lamations did not help the enemy as much as his exposed and isolated posis at Lex ington and elsewhere. His proclamation did not injure the Administration as- much as a single purchase of worthless arms and the erection of useless earth works. He (Blair) dld not believe that Gen. Fremont was authorized to publish his statement, which was extraordinary in its character. Mr. Gooch , of Massachusetts, (Rep.,) member of the Committee on the Conduct of the War, said that Gen. Fremont hav- ing presented a large number of docu- ments, was requested by the Committee to prepare a concise statement as to the administration of afi’airs in his Depart- ment, which he (Fremont) did at a sub- sequent pcriod. Gen. Fremont again ap. peared before the Committee and was questioned. When he was about to leave the room he was requested not to give information to anybody outside, of what he had stated to the Committee. He (Gooch) understood Gen. Fremont to acquiesce in the request, as he had in all others made by- tbe Committee. He inch iron plates, having a thick backing . (Goocb) only wished to add that the pub- lication was made without the knowledge and against the consent of the Committee. Mr. Blair—Was it all published? Mr. Gooch—His (Fiemont’s) state. ment and documents, and not the portion in response to the inquiries of the Com- mittee. was as extraordinary as the manner in which it found its way into print. It was ingenious in the suppression of impor- tant facts and suggestions of others which never existed. In this he shows he is a better apologist for defeat than a General to achieve victories. Mr. Blair proceeded to speak of his early friendship for Fremont. He now had no private jgriefs. And it was only for the reason that Fremont was found to be incompe- tent for his position that he recommend- ed his removal. He had acted from con- siderations of public duty. He then spoke at length of the disasters at Spring- field and Lexington, to show that these were attributable to Fremont’s incompe- tency. Those by whom be surrounded himself had settled themselves down up- on us like obscene birds of prey. No men have as bad characters as those who are Fremont’s familiars. Of course there are honorable exceptions. No greater slander was uttered by any man than that, at the time Fremont went to St. Louis, it was a rebellious city. The declaration of martial law was, therefore, superinduced by his apprehension of im- aginary danger. Mr. Blair also examin- ed Fremont’s contracts and other tran- sactions. He spoke for about two hours, the time having, by unanimous consent, been extended. Mr. Colfax, of Indiana, (Rep.,)—I did not intend to reply at this time, and am.‘ therefore, ill-prepared to answer the elab- orate charges made against Gen. Fremont by the gentleman from Missouri. While .I differ frbm him in regard to the super ccdure of Fremont in the command of the Department of the Northwest, I wish to be distinctly understood to say that, no matter who is in Command, I sustain that General, with all my heart and soul, and strength and mind, who acts most effec- tually against the enemy. I believe it my duty to do so, for this, under God, is, our only hope of putting down this gigan-_ tie and Satanic rebellion. ,But I must say that I deeply regret that the gentle- man should havc indulged in the remarks he did, in debating a grave question like this; that on such an occasion he should have mingled personalties and charges which would be better indulged in on some more fitting arena. I will not touch upon the opening of the remarks of the gentleman, with regard to his family’s previous relations with Gen. Fremont, for I am here to speak in vindication of his- tory, of the fair record of the present day and to prove that my fflend’s feelings and judgment are'pcrvertcd by prejudices.— The gentleman oppOsite had been the friend of Gen. Fremont up to the latter end of August. Up to that time be (Mr Blair) was the warm and devoted friend, the champion and admirer of _ Gen. Fre- mout. Up to that time no charges had been made by him. From the time the war broke out, I tried, in my humble sphere, to sustain confidence in our Gen- rals. I endeavored to preach forbear- ance and unity. I implored men to cease deprecating Generals in the field. I felt that when they went forth the cause of the country rested on them; that they had the lives of our brave soldiers on their hands,nnd that they should be supported. Whenever the Administration superse- ded them, well and good. Let them go. With regard to the charges to-day reiter- ated on this floor against Gen. Fremont, I will first say that I do not claim forGen. Fremont the character of a perfect man. As all men are follible,‘so he had his faults. He was an impulsive and impetuous man. But I regret that he published the state- ment of defence he did.- But Gen. Fre- mont must have concluded that he had already abided his time long enough.— After six months, under the whip and spur and lash of howling enemies, he held and, with an abandonment of self and a reticeuce which has commanded the ad- miration of friends and the approval of the civilzed world, waited patiently his vindication since the day he was deposed from his command to the present. N ow. without disparaging others, I say that be is the only Major-General in the United States Army who has gone with his troops away from headquarters in pursuit of the enemy, performing long marches, forging rivers, and never haulting till he had brought the foe to boy. Others, no doubt, were willing to do all in their power to the same cud—but this is the only instance at the time of this determin- ation and courage of Gen. Fremont.— And new I say that no man can believe the aspersion ventured upon by the gen- tleman from Missouri, that Gen. Fremont is a timid man. Every school boy in the country knows the history of the man and that history disposes of that aspersion.-—- Whether, as a General, he was fitted for the command of the Western Department or not,,he is a brave and fearless man, a man who has met death in various forms and encountered perils in every shape; a man who has written his name on the page of history as a great discoverer—- Jadveuturer, if you will; one who has rate Mr. Blair said Fremont’s statement, an apology for disaster and defeat, and- ed the Stars and Stripes on distant soil, through privationva'nd toil and suffering, to the improvement of science and the glory of his country; ’Last of all, even while he knew the sword of Damocles was suspended over his head by a single hair, he went with his army in pursuit of the enemies of his country, leading the ad- vance in person, not bringing up the rear as is customary with Generals in com- mand. No, Sir, Gen. Fremont is no cow- ard, but a. brave and fearless man. With regard to the charge about the contracts desiring to be frank, I say that I do not approve of the contracts made by Gen Fremont with regard to the fortification for Missouri; hut in making these con- tracts, it must be supposed that he was guided by the Opinion of the head engi- neer of the department with regard to the price. But if his outlay in this re- spect was improvident and extravagant, I have only to express the hope that the expenditures of the public money in other departments have been managed with scrupulous economy. We all know the charge brought against him by Adjutant Gen. Thomas, that the horses purchased by him were ring-boned and spavined,&c. Now, when I come to Washington I found that there were fourteen hundred horses purchased for the army of the Po- tomac, condemned, and not a paper in the country had a word to say about it, but because a few horses were condemned in Fremont’s command, all sorts of charges are bro’t against him. The gentleman from Missouri had beeuveryeulsgistic ofSt.Lou- is its patriotism, &c. N ow,I wish I could believe all he said in its favor.I, indeed be- lieve with him,tbat the bulk of the people are loyal, but I as firmly believe that the wealth and capital, and social influence of St. Louis were strongly on the side of se- cession, even since Gen. Halleck took command of that Department. They held an election in that city for Chamber of Commerce, and was called the “seces- sion ticket” was elected by a large ma- jority, in the face even of the Major-Gem. eral of the United States comanding. In speaking of the sentiments which actua- ted a portion of the people of that city, I speak of its wealth and capital as be- ing strongly on the side of secession; and so strongly was this feeling manifested, that General Halleck compelled the Chamber of Commerce to take the oath of allegiance. I know St. Louis is loyal, and one of the strongest proofs of that is found in the fact that, when their deposed General came back degraded and deposed from his command, without power or place, they gathered around him in tens of thousands to welcome him. I take that as a strong proof of their loyalty.— The gentleman (Mr. Blair) says that up to the time of the death of Lyon he had been a warm friend of Fremont. Now, the fact is that Lyon’s deathoccurred on the 10th of August, and it is seen that the gentleman’s friendship continued for Fremont till even after this—continued for him whom he has since arraigned as a guilty criminal, as one whose skirts are stained with the blood of that brave ofii- cer—nrrnigus him now of a crime, which if guRty of murder, which, if he (Gen. Fremont,) had the power to relieve him and did not. But though Lyon died early in August, it is not till September that the gentleman fromMissouri consider Fremont guilty, becaused for twenty days after he did not accdse him of the crime. Mr. Colfax quoted several dispatches from Gen. Scoficld Harding, and Gen. Lyon himself, to show the impossibility of reinforceing Lyon, even before the with- drawal of the large drafts of troops from the Southwest for the protection of Wash- ington, and continued. It was under, therefore, the most adverse cirCumstances that Gen. Fremont took command at St- Louis; and it was for raising an army to protect theiUnion, and to put down rebel- lion that he has been condemned from one end of the country to the other. The gentleman Opposite declared here that Cairo did not need reinforcements but I say it did. Fremont had at this timc'a few regiments, three of three months’ men who had not yet received any pay, and who would not re-eulist, but were in con- sequence of neglect, determined to aband- on the service. Now, I submit to this House, and to the country, the consideration of the two points to be reinforced. One was the 'ond of a common wagon road, from whence Lyon could have retreated if he could not maintain himself; the other was at the mouth of the Ohio, which commanded the Mississippi and the Mis- souri rivers at Cairo, the furthest point south we then had in our possession. It was then in great danger of being wrest- ed from us, and rebel Governors and leaders had sent down troops to seize it for the Secessionists. Now, Gen. Fre- mont could only reinforce one of these two points, and he chose the most impor- tant, and went to Cairo. Mr. Colfax read letters and dispatches from Gen. Prentiss, to show the imminency which demanded the stcngthening of Cairo, and continued; Cairo was at that time threat- ened by the enemy, thirty thousand strong. He had with him only eight regiments, and only two of these he had a right to hold. He did the best he could. He got together all the force he could muster, and went down on steam- boats to Cairo. And for this, too, he was condemned all over the country, be- cause, indeed, he should have traveled by steamboats and thus make a parade. But it was actually necessary to do so, in order that he might impress the rebels with the conviction that he commanded a larger force than he really did. There were also great complaints made because Gen. Fremont went in a‘ carriage to the boat. I inquired into this matter, and the fact is that his friends brought the carriage to his house for the purpose of conveying him to the wharf. When he saw the carriage he refused to enter it, saying, “ No, I will not go in this state.” His friends insisted, because they feared he would be assassinated on the way if he went on foot, while at the same time it was necessary, as Major-General, to show himself from an open carriage to loyal people. A good deal was also said about the six thousand dollar house be rented in St. Louis. I also inquired into this charge, and found that all his imme. diate officers were quartered in the some house, which was also used for the OR‘I- cers of the Department, as there was no time for traveling from office to office.— A great public saving was afi‘ected in this way, and yet for this also has Gen. Fremont been denounced. Another of the charges brought against him was with regard to the purchase of five hundred tons of ice, with which it was sneeringly said there should be glorious times making sherry cobblers for the Staff.— From inquiry I ascertained that this ice was ordered, on the requisition of the Surgeon. At the time the requisition was made for the ice, half the troops Were sick from using the muddy waters of the steams in the vicinity of the camps, and when the sick men were sent to the hospitals they remained sick, for even there they had none but this impure wa— ter, which first prostrated them. Of one regiment—the Twenty-second Illinois—— the majority were in hospital from mala- ria and the use of bad water. The ice was procured, not to follOw the army, but to be used in the hospitals by the sick and wounded soldier—for the use of the men who had- shed their blood for the country. For this Geo. Fremont had been denounced all over the country, and to these charges and accusations he has been silent and forebore to answer up to this time. The gentleman (Mr. Blair) said the hundred days of Fremont were the saddest days that had over befallen the loyal men of the Northest- l difi'er with him there, also. Oh, no; there were sadder days than those. It was after Gen. Fremont was deposed, when the gallant army, with which he had driven off the enemy, was ordered to fall back. Then it was that the loyal men, who had so long sufi‘ered from the presence of the rebels, and who hailed the glorious Stars and Stripes with ac- clamations as the promise of safety and security, and with clasped hands and joy- ful faces cheered once more for the Union ——it was when these people forsook their homes to follow in sad procession the re- treating army tq avoid the halter and the gibbet, hopeless and fondless, the days following that which saw Fremont de- posed. These were the saddest days for the people of the Northwest. The gentleman from Missouri charac- terized the proclamation issued by Gen. Fremont as bombastic. I have this to say about that proclamation ; I never quarreled with the President because he saw fit to say that that proclamation should be modified. I regret that he did so, but I know Mr. Lincoln is as honest a man as lives on this continent, and he noted, no doubt, from convictions of du- ty, and while I differ with him in respect to that proclamation, I would be the last to asperse an act of his. The President said it should be modified. But Gen. Fremont said the President must then modify it himself; he would bow to the order as a subordinate should to the rebuke of his chief. The gentleman (Mr. Blair) might have refrained from his remarks with reference to what he called the “mutiny” at Springfield.— Now, he had it from distinguished au- thority, that a spirit of insubordination was manifested all CV or the camps when it was known that their General was su- perceded in his command. It was then that he delivered his farewell to the ur- my, and the whole country was seized with admiration when they saw how a brave and noble man was stricken down can fall without a word of complaint and without a murmur. Gen. Fremont’s con- duct on the occasion should have shielded him from at least one charge of the gen- tleman opposite. Even those New York papers, which had most persistently de~ nouuced him, expressed in eulogistic lan- guage their admiration of his conduct in that trying moment. It is true he could not escape au ovation in St. Louison his return ; but in Cincinnati, when he learned, as he was going through it, that the citizens were determined to give him an ovation, be avoided it by keeping on his way, even declining to accept of its hospitalities. Has there ever been a man stricken down from high position under a pressure of untoward circum- stances, who has borne himself so meek- ly ? I speak as an independent member of this House, not having had one fact communicated to me by Gen. Fremont. New, with regard to the proclamation.— tht difi'erence was there between it and the declaration of that distinguished man, Andrew Johnson, one of the most loyal men living? Johnson declared that no rebel had a right to own any- thing. That was all Fremont said, clothed in the language of a proclama- tion. He said, “The real and personal property of rebels shall be confiscated, and the slaves of any shall be free men." Johnson says, “No rebel has a right to own anything .” Idon’t see any difi'er- ence, and yet no person has attempted to condemn Johnson. I come now to the f all of Lexington. I happened to be in St. Louis on the 14th of September, and found the whole city excited with the news which had just reached there, that Price was marching upon the gallant de- fender of the town of Lexington, and when my friend speaks about the Home Guard, it appears to me that CO1. Mul- ligan didn’t hear very high testimony to their gallantry then. But I saw Lieut- GOv. Hall, and he told me that Price was marching towards Lexington with 15,- 000 men, and that Fremont ought, to send out a column to interrupt him. I asked him how many men Fremont had, and he said thought he he had 20,000. I thought if he had that number he cer- tainly could send out some ; and went to Gen. Fremont, full of zeal for the rein. forcement of Mulligan, and told him what Lieut.-Gov. Hall had said, and that if he had twenty thousand men some ought to, be sent out. He said, “I will tell'yOu, confidentially, what I would not have 4 known in the streets of St. Louis for my life. They have got the opinion that I have twenty thousand men here. I will show you what I have really got.” He rang the bcll, and his Secretary came and brought the muster-roll for that day, and by that muster-roll he had in St. Louis, and within seven miles round about, less thdn eight thousand troops, and only two of them full regiments. It . was a beggurly array of. an army, and it time. But I asked him if he could not spare some of these ? Sir, the tears stood in his eyes as he handed me two telegraphic dispatches he had that . day reccived from Washington. I, will read- thcm that you may see how little was at ' his command to reinforce Mulligan. Mr. Colfax then read the dispatches ordering him to rent] 5000 armed infantry to Washington, and continued, . I have shdwn you that he had men,but no guns; and when he bought guns, the necessity for which was imperious, he was de- nounced from one end Of the country to the other because they were not Spring- field rifles of the best quality. . Yet he must send five thousand well-armed in fautry to Washington at once, and this draft on him was to be replaced by troops from Kansas, or wherever he could best gather them. I asked him, “What can you do (and my heart sank within meias I asked the question) here with an infe- rior force, and your best forces sent away to Washington 1” Said he, “Washing- ton must be in danger, and they must have my troops, though Missouri fall, and I myself fall.” After Iheard Lthat, I would have been a traitor to my con- victions if I did not stand‘ up to defend this man, who was willing to sacrifice himself to defend the imperilled capitol of the country. Mr. Blair said Gen. Fremont made a return to Secretary Cameron about the same time, which showed that he had 50,000 men in his department. Mr. Colfax—l am coming to, that very point. He telegraphed to Washington that he was preparing to obey the order received, and I doubt not it made his heart bleed, knowing the strait Mulligan was in. Then he telegraphed to Gov. Morton and Gov. Dcnuison for more troops, andthe answer he received was, that they had received orders tdsend all their trOOps East. SO there his reliance failed. My friend says it cannot be shown that be moved any of his men un- til after Lexington had fallen. Lexing- ton fcll on Friday, the 22d of September. I well remember the day. Here are dis- patches tO Gen. Pope, on the 16th of September, and dispatches from Gen. Sturges tO Col. Davis, hurrying the men. The wires were hot with orders hurrying the men to reinforce Mulligan. Pope telegraphed on the 17th of September, that his troops would be there day after tomorrow, which would have been two days before Lexington surrendered, and Sturgis thought he should be there on Thursday. Col. Mulligan told me him- self that if Sturgcs had appeared on the opposite side of the river, he thought Price would have retired. Thus from three sources, Fremont sent on troops to reinforce Mulligan, but he failed to do it . because the elements seemed, to be against him, and not because hedid not seek to do so in every possible way that he could send succor to him. At this very time there were all the different posts in Missouri to be held; his three menths’ men were rapidly retiring and his best men sent to Washington ; Price with 15,000 men marching to Lexington; McCulloch threatening Rolla, Hardee threatening Ironton, and Polk and Pil- low at Columbus ; and all over the State were organized bands of rebels—about 80,000 men—threatening him, and he with an inadequate force to meet them. And while thus struggling, from every [Concluded rm- Fourth Page] was all needed to defend that city at that ' '