I V - .-A...-s,. -, , . -. i’ ’ peiice without, and tranquility within, oiri .- sidcratioii of Congress at their last Session, . later recognizing’ the independence of our ’i':ave*had the most satisfactory assurances,that I of both. .110 less than by print.-iples of fair and liberal criiguiiration, so far. as was found-attainable, it .~~. .. _J_-, . _. -__-3 CONGRESS. The 2d session of the 19th Congress com- tneuceil on Monday, 1th ll'lSlafll‘i. The" Vice President look the chair and ‘called the Sen- tale. to orderiat I2 o’i-lock, when it appeareil that near 40 iuembers were present. ‘The Speaker ofthe House, Mr. Taylor, took his ' seat at 12,aird upon callirrg the roll 170i-nein bers answered to their names. The Senaii ailupti.-rl l’eSr)llJll0llS to wear crape 30 days in respect to the ineiuories of M r. Van Dylie, of Del. and"M_r. M'Ilvaine, ‘of N. Jersey, both deceased during the recess. The two houses 'in_teichanged messages, and appointed a joint committee to wait irpon the President to in form him that they, were ready to proceid «'l0'l'-llSlflt‘SS., Mr.‘IrIa‘yne, of S.Ca‘rolina gave not‘ti:r- that on Wednesday he should brhrg a ‘cease wllriile the Convenfion should‘ continue in force. ‘By the effect of this stipulation. three fuiirths 'ofthe'diseriininating duties that had been levied by each party upon the ves- sels ofthe other in its ports,have already been removed; and on the [st of next October. should the Convention be still in force, the remaining fourth will be discontinued. Fr. vessels, laden with French produce, will be received in our ports on the sanre terms as our own ; and ours, in return, will enjoy the saute advantages in the ports ofFrance. By these approximations to an equality ofduties not only has the commer'ce of the two coun- tries prospered, but friendly dispositions have been promoted. They will continue to be tzherished and cultivated _on the part of the United States-. It would have been gratify; ‘mg to have had it in my power to add, that tl~.e claitns upon the justice ofthe French gov- bill betore the Senate for a uniforiu system of ethmhnt. lt‘-V0lVing the property and thecom-' barrltrirptcy. The usual orders for furnishing “the members with papers were adopted, after which both houses atljouriied. On 'I‘ues-day the President commuriidated . to the two _houses the following MESSAGE; ofv-lricli 8000 ct r.ii'~s, with its accontparrylng documents, were t‘»rder'ed to beprinted for the use of flit: Senate. and 6000 for the -house. Fellow citizens of the Senate and qf the House of Representatives: The assemblage ol the Representatives of our Union in both Houses of Congress at this time occurs under circumstances calling for ihe renewed homage of our grateful acknowl- edgements to the Giver ofall Good. With the exceptions incidental to the most felicitous .§;'On(.llll0ll ofhuinan existence, we cuntinueto be highly favoured in all the elements which contribute to individual comfort and to na- tional prosperity. In the survey ofour ex- tensive country, we have getierally to observe zrbodes ofhealth and regions of plcirty. In our civil and political relations, we have borders. We are, as a people, increasing with nziabated rapidity in population, wealth, and national resources; and, whatever differences ofopinion exist among us, with regardto the tiiode and the means by which we shall turn the beneficeiice of Heaven to the im- provenrent of our own condition, there is yet a spirit, animatiirig its all, which will not suf- fer the bounties ofProvidence to be shower- ed trpon us in vain, but will receive them with grateful hearts, and apply them with unwearied hands, to the advancement ofthe general good. _ Oftlie subjects recoirimended to the con- sonte were then definitively acted upon.—— Others left unfmislied, but partly tnatiried,wil| recur to your attention, without needing a re- riewal of notice from me. The purpose of this Ct-‘fl‘llDUl),lC3l.lOt) will be, to present to your view the general aspect of oitr public af fairs at this moment, and the nieasirres which have been taken to carry into effect the inten- tion ofthe legislature as signified by the laws their and heretofore enacted. In our intercourse with the other nations of the earth, we have_still the happiness ofou- :,oying peace and a general good understand- ll)g—.,-—(]t]itllfi8(l, however, in several iinporiani iU5l"m'95. by C0lllSl0ns.0finterest, and by irri- .-;-itixfié ct claims ofjusticc,to the settlement of 'r'~lll(.ll,l.l'iC constitutional interposition ofthe icgislutive authority may become ultimately izidisjrciisable. By the decease ofthc Emperor Alexander nfltussia, which occurred coteniponineoiisly with the conriiienceiticnt of the last Session 0fC0ngress., the U. 8. have been deprived of ti lonii, tried, steady, and faithful frieiitl. Borir tothe iulreritatrcc of absolute power, and trained in the school ofadversity, front which po power on earili, however absolute, is ex- entpt, that monarch, from his youth, had been ti_ruglrt tt1_feel the force and value of public opinion, and to be sensible that the interests ofhis own government would best be pro- l_’tl0l8d by a frank an_d frieirdly intercourse with this Republic, as those of his people would be advanced by a liberal commercial intercourse with our coirntry. A candid and" confidential interchange‘ of sentiments be- tween him and the government ofthe United States. upon the affairs ‘of Southern America, took place at a period not long preceding his tieinisr-, and corriribiited to fix that course of policy which left to the other governments of Europe no alternative but that ofsooner or southern neighbors,ofwliiclr theexatnple had, by the U. States, alréady been set. The or- dinary diplomatic communications between his sttccessor, the Eiriperor Nicholas, and the U. States, have suffered some interruption by the illness, departure, and subsequent de- cease ofliis minister residing here, who en- joyed, as he merited, the entire confidence of his new sovereign, as he had emiirently re spondnd to that of his predecessor. But we the scirtinrents ofthe reigning Emperor to- wards the U. S. are altogether conformable ti) those which hnd so long and constantly aniui:rteil' his imperial brother ; and we have reason to hope that they trill serve lo cement that harmony and good undt,-rstairding be- tween the two tiatiuirs, which‘, founded in congenial interests, cannot but result in the advunccmciit of the welfare and prosperity Our relations of commerce and navigation with France are, by the operation of the Convention offlrith June, 182:2, with that tia- tiou, in a state of gradual and progressive im- provement. Convinced,by all our experience, reciprocity, which the United States have constantly tendcreil to all the nations of the emtlnasthe rule of coiiimerci:-rl intercourse which they would universally prefer,tliat fair and equal competition is most conducive to the interest of both parties, the United States, in the negotiation of that Convention, ear- Vnestly contended for a uiiittial renurrciatiori of discriminating duties and charges in the ports of the tivocounrries. Unable to obtain the inirrrediatc recognition of this principle in its full extent, after rcducing'the duties of dis- it‘-..s agreed that, at the expiration oftwo years- from the lstofOctober, race, when the Con- vorizioir was to go into effect, unless a irotice ofsix tuuiiths on either sidelshould be given . in the other, that the Convention ‘user! must t_,eriuinatc, thosegdutice should be reduced" by one fourth; and that this reduction shoiild be ‘ fortahle subsisteir-:e of many of our fellow citizens, and which have been so long and so earnestly urged, were in a more promising train of adjtrstinent than at your last meeting; hirt their condition remains unaltered. With the government of the Netherlands, the mutual abandonment of discriminating duties had been regulated by Legislative acts. on both sides The act of Congress of the ‘.’0th April. 1818, abolished all discrittiimiiia- ting duties ofinrpost and tonnage, upon the vesselsancl produce ofthe Netherlands in the ports ofthe United States, upon the assurairce given by the government of the Netherlands, that all such duties operating against the ship- ping and cirmnierce of the United States, in that kingdom, had been abolished. These re- ciprocal regulations had contiiitied in force several years, when the discriminating prin- ciple was resumed by the Netherlands in a new and indirect form, by a bouirty of ten per cen . in the shape ofa return ofiluties to their national vessels and in which those ofthe U- nited States are not permitted to pmticipate. By the act ofCongress of 7th January, 1824, all ilisciiininating duties in the United States were again suspended, so far as related to the vessels and produce of the Netherlands, so long as the reciprocal exemption should be eztetide'd to the vessels and produce of the United States in the Netherlands. Brit the same act provides that in the event ofa res- toration of discriminating duties, to operate against the shipping and commerce ofthe U. States, in any ofthe foreign countries referred to therein, the suspension of discriminating duties in favor of the navigation ofsiich for- eign country should cease, and all the provis- ions of the acts imposing discriminating for- eign tonnage and iinpost duties in the United States, sliouldrevive and be in full force with regard to that nation. -In the correspondence with the government ofthe Netherlairds upon this subject, they have contended that the favour shown to their own shipping by this bounty upon their tou- nage, is not to be consiileted as a iliscrituina- ting ditty, Butitcaiinnt be denied that it produces all the same. effects. Hail the inti- tiial abolition been stipulated by treaty, such a bounty upon the national vessels could scarcely have been granted consistently with good faith. Yet. as the act of Congress of 7th January, I824, has not expressly author- ized the Executive authority to determine what shall be coirsidered as a revival of dis ciiminating duties by it foreign Goveririirent to the disatlvaiitage ofthe United States, and as the retaliatory measure on our part, how evcrjiist and necessary, may tend rather to that conflict oflegislation which we deprecate than to that concert to which we invite all commercial nations, as most conducive to their interest and oirr own, I have thought it iuore consistent with the spirit of our institu- tions to refer the subject again to the para- mount authority ofthe Legislature to decide what measure the eiriergericy may requ re, than abruptly, by proclaination, to carry into effect the iniuatory provision ofthe act ofl8.°2l. During the last session of'Congress, Trea ties of Amity, Navigation, and Cotnnrerce. were negotiated mil signed at this place with the Governtnent of Denmark, in Europe, and with the Federation of Central America, in this liemisphere. These Treaties thcu rec’d the constitutional sanction ofthe Senate, by the advice aiiil consent to their ratification — They were accordingly ratified on the part of the U. States, and, during the recess of Coir grcss..have also been ratified by the other re- spective contracting parties. The ratificatious have been exchanged, and they have been published by Proclainations, copies of which are herewith communicated to Congress.- These Treaties have established between the contracting parties the principles of equality and reciprocity in their broadest and itrost lib- eral extent: Each party admitting the ves- sels of the other into its ports, laden with car- goes the produce or manufacture ofany quar ter ofthe globe, upon the payment ofthe same duties oftoniiage and impost that are charge- able upon their own. They have further sti- pulated, that the parties shall hereafter grant no favour of navigation or commerce to any other nation, which shall not, upon the same terms, be grained to each other; and that neither party will impose upon articles of mer- chandise, the produce or manufacture of the other. any other or higher duties than upon the like articles, being the produce or manu- facture ofany other country. To these priti ciples there is, in the Convention with Deir- mark, an exception, with regard to the Colo- uies ofihat Kingdom in the Arctic Seas, but none with regard to her colonies in the W. I. In the coitrse of the last sumtuer, the term to which our last Commercial Treaty with Sweden was limited, has expired. A coir- tinuation of it is in the contemplaii-on of the Swedish Governirrent, and is believed to be desirable on the part of the United States. It has been proposed by the King of Sweden, that, pending the negotiation of renewal, the expired Treaty should be mutually consider ed as still in force; a measure which will re- qirrre the sanction of£'ougress to be crtrried iirto effect on our part, and which I therefore recotnmend to your consideration. With Prussia, Spain. Portugal, and in general all the European Powers, between whom and the U S. relations of friendly in- tercourse have existed, their condition lid’! not materially varied since the last session oz’ Congress. ‘ [regret not to be able to say the satire of our commercial intercourse with the Colonial Possessions o-fGreat B7ll;|Ill, in A- -nerica. Negotiations ofthe highest iiupnri-_ --nce to our comtnoii interests have ".»eett-for several years in discussion, betwr-_w.~;:_ the tri- Gov-rrnnreuts; and on the part ofthe Uni.»--71 I .. -- .~‘;_ .‘ ' Y’ spirit of‘ candor and coi‘ibrlriitio’n. interests of great magnitude and delicacy had been adjusted by the Conventions of 1815 and ’l8, while that 'ufl822, mediated by~the‘l-are Em- peror Alexander, had promised a satisfactory compromise of claims which the government of rhe United states, in justice to the rights of a numerous class of their -citizens, was bound to sustain. But with regard to the commercial intercourse between the Uirited States and the British_Coloni'es in America," ithas been hitherto found impracticable to bring the parties to an understanding satis- factory to both. The relative geographical position, and the respective products of nature cultivated by human industry, had constituted the elements ofa coninrercial intercourse be- tween the U. States and British America, in- stilar'aiid continental, important to the inhab- itants of both countries. But it had been in’- terdicted by Great Britain, upon a principle heretofore practised upon by the colonizing nations of Europe, of holding the trade of their colonies,each in exclusive monopoly to herself. After the termination of the late war, this interdiction had been: revived, and the British Government declined including this lJOI'tl0n of our intercourse with her pos- sessions in the negotiation ofthe Convention of 181.5. The trade was then carried on ex- clusivelr in British vessels, till the act _ofCon gress concerning navigation, of 1818, and the supplemeirtal act of 1820, ' tnet the interdict by a corresponding tneasure on the part of the United States. These measures, not of retaliation, but ofnecessary sell-defence, were soon succeeded by an Act of Parliament, 0- pening certain colonial ports to the vessels of the U. States, coining directly from them,and to the importation from them ofcertain artic- les of our produce, burdened with heavy du- ties, and excluding some of t_he most valuable articles ofour exports. The United States opened their ports to British vessels from the Colonies, upon terms as exactly correspond- ing with those ofthe Act ofParlianrent, as,in the relative position ofthe parties, could be made. And a negotiation was commenced by mutual couseirt, with the hope, on oirr part, that a reciprocal spirit of accomrrioila-_ lion and a common sentiment of the import once of the trade to the interests ofthein- habitants ofthe two countries, between wltoin it nrust be carrieil on. would irltiiirately bring the parties to a compromise, with which both might be satisfied. With this view, the Go- verninent ofthe United States had determin- ed to sacrifice something ofihat entire reci- pl‘Of‘ll}’ wliichiu all commercial arrangements with Foreign Powers they are entitled to de- tllfltttlr and to acquiesce in some iiieqitzrlities disailvantageous to ourselves, rather than to forego the benefit of a f-iiral and perinaueut adjiistiirent of this interest, to the satisfaction of Great Britain herself. The negotiation. repeatedly suspended by accidental circtnn- stances. was, however, by lfltllllal agreement and express assent, considered" as pending, and to be speedily resumed. In the mean time, another act of Parliament. so doubtful :.-rid anibiguous in its iiuport as to have beeir inisirnderstood by the officers in the Colonies who were to carry it into 8X(_‘Clll.lOfl, opens a- gain certain Colonial ports. upon new condi-- iions atiil terms, with a threat to close them H.‘.’.'-tins! any Nation which may not accept these terms, as prescribed by the British Go- Vrtfllfllellf. 'l‘liis act passed in July, 1825,uot coiiiinuiiicated to the Government of the U. States, not understood by the British Officers of the Cirstoins in the Colonies where it was to be enforced, was nevertheless siihinited to the consideration of Congress, at their last session. \Vith the ltirowledge that a negotia- tion upon the subject had long been in pro- gress. and pledges given of its resumption at an early day, it was deemed expedient to a- wait the result of that negotiation, rather than to subscribe implicitly to terms the im- port of which was not clear, and which the British authorities themselves, in this heuris- phere, were not prepared to explain. Inriuediatelyafter the close uftlie last session ofcopgress, one ofunr mo 1 distinguished cit- IZI‘-nttjtvas despaiched as Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary to great Brittain. furirislied with instructions which we could not_.tlotibt would lead to a conclirsioii of this long coutroverted interest, upon terms accept- able to Great Britain-. Upon his arrival, and before he had delivered his letters of cre- dence, he was met by an Order ofthe British Council, excluding, from and after the first of December now current, the vessels ofthe U. S. from all the Colonial Briiisli ports, except- ing those immediately bordering tipou our Territories. In answer to his expostulations upon a measure thus unexpected, he is in- forinegl that, according to the ancient maxims of policy of European nations having colonies. their trade is an exclusive possession of the mother country. That all participatiotr in it by other nations, is a boon or favor not fortn- mg a subject ofnegociatiou, birt to be regula- ted by the Legislative acts ofthe Power own- ing the colony. That the British Government therefore, declines negotiating concerning it ; 81. that as the United States did not forihwitlr accept purely and simply the terms offered by the Act ofParliament, of July, 1395, Great Britain would not now adnrit the_ vessels ofthe United States, even upon the terms on tvfiich she has opened them to the navigation of other nations. We have lreen accustomed to considerthc trade which we have enjoyed with the British Colonies, rather as an interchange ofuruiual bBflefil.S,__lllall as amere favor received ; that, under every circumstance, we have given an ample equivalent. We have seen every other natioir, holding Colonies, negotiate with oth- er nations, and grant tlieiir, freely, admission to the Colonies by Treaty ; and, so far are the other colouising nations of Europe now frorn-refusihg to negotiate for trade with their Colonies, that we ourselves have secured ac- cess to the Colonies of more than one of them by Treaty. The refusal, however, of Great Britain, to négotiate, leaves to the U. States no other alternative than that of reg- ulating or interdicting, altogether, the trade on their part,acc'ording as either measure may affect the interests of our own country ; and, with that exclusive object, Irvoulil recom-' mend the whole subject to your calm and can- 'did deliberations. It is hoped that our unavailing exertions to 1-'!CC0lIlpllSlI a cordial good understanding on this interest, will not have an unpropitious ef- fect upon the other great topics of discussion, l‘it~‘t§V>?el) the two governments. Our North-' Eastern and North-Western boundaries are --tillnuagjusted. The Cominissiotrers, under ifiarly repeated until, all discriiaitratiop shoulti at Stat_e§ have beéii invariably pursued in the the 7th_ Article’ of the Treaty of Gltent,'have‘- ' \ ri'e:rriy”t:on‘ie toihe close oftlieir ‘labours’; nor can we renounce the expectatiou,enfeebled as it is,‘that they may agree upon their report, to the satisfaction or acqtiiescence of both parties. ’ The Commission for liquidating the‘ claims for slaves carried away after the close of the war, has been sitting, with doubtful prospects of success. Propositions of com promiseliave, however, passed between the two governments, the result of which, we flat-' ter ourselves, may yet prove satisfactory. Our owir dispositions and purposes towards Great Britain are all friendly and conciliatory ; nor can we abandon, but with strong reluctance, the hope that they will ultimately meet a re- turn, notoffavors, which we neither ask HOT desire, but of equal reciprocity and good will. With the American governments of this hemisphere, we continue_ to maintain an in- tercourse altogether friendly, and between their nations and ours that commercial inter- change" of which mutual benefit is the source, and mutual coirrfort and harmo- uy the result, is in a continual_ state of iiu- provement. The war between Spain and them, since the total expulsion of the Spanish military force from their continerital territo- rics, has been little more than nominal ; and their internal tranqiiility, though 0.CCaSl0tl3ll.l’ menaced by the agitations which civil wars Itever fail to leave behind them, has not’ been affected by any serious calamity. The Congress of Ministers from several of those nations which assembled at Pantrma,af- "ter a short session there, adjourned to meet a- gain, at it more favorable season, in the vi- cinity of Mexico. The decease ofone of our Ministers on his way to the Isthmus, and the "impediments ofthe season, which delayed the departure ofthe other, deprived us of the ad- vantage of being represented at the first meet- ing ofthe Congress. There is, however, no reason to believe that any ofthe transactions ofthe Congress were ofa nature to affect in- juriously the iirterests ofthe United States, or to require the interposition of our Ministers. had they been present. Their absence has indeed deprived us of the opportunity of pos- sessing precise and authentic inforination of the treaties that were corrcliiiled at Panama; and the whole result has cotifiriued me in the conviction of the expediency to the U. States ofbeing represented at the Congress. The surviving itreniher of the mission, appoi-ited during your last session, has accordingly pro ceeded to his destination, and a siiccessor to his distiiigirished and lamented associate will he nuininated to the Senate. A treaty ofam- ity, uavigatioir, and comnrerce, has, in the course of the last stiinmer, been coiicluded by iriir Minister Plenipotentiary at Mexico, with the United States of that Confederacy, which will also be laid before the Senate for their advice with regard to its ratification. lu adverting to the present condition of our fiscal coircerns, and to the prospects of our revenue, the first remark that calls our atten- tion, is, that they are less exuberairtly pros- perous than they were at the corresponding period ofthe last year. The severe shoclt so extensively sustained by the coiirnrcrcial and uranufacturing interests in Great Britain, has not been without a perceptible recoil up- on oursclves. A reduced importation from abroad is necessarily succeeded by 2! reduced return to the Treasury at borne. The net rev- enue ofthe present year will not equal that of the last. And the receipts ofihat which is to come will fall short of those in the current year. The diminution, however, is in part attributable to the flourishing condition of some of our domestic rnariirlactures, and so fair is compensated by an equivalent iuore profitable to the nation. It is also highly grat- ifying to perceive that the deficiency in the revenue, while it scarcely exceeds the antici- patiuits ofthe lastyear’s estiinirtes from the Treasury, has not interrupted the application of more than eleven millions during the pres ent year, to the discharge ofthe principal and interest ofthcdebt, nor the-reduction of up- wards ofseve I millions ofthe ca ital debt it- self The balance in the treasury on the first of January last, was 85,201,650 43. The re ceipis from that time to the 30th September last, were 819,585,932 50. The receipts of ilie current qirarter, estimated at six millions oftlullars, yield, with the sums already rec’d, El revenue of about twenty-five millions and a half for the year. The expenditures for the first three quarters ofthe year have amounted to 818,714,226 66. The. expenditures of the current quarter are expected, iuclniling the I‘-V0‘fnllllUflS ofthe principal debt to be paid, to balance the receipts. So that the expenses ofthe year,amounting to upwards ofa inillioir less than its income, will leave‘a proportional- ly increased balance in the Treasury on the first ol'January. 1827, over that of the first of January last. Instead of five millions two liirndred thousand, there will be six millions four hundred thousand dollars. The amount of duties secured on merchan- digae imported from the corniiieiicement of the year until the 30th of September, is esti mated at twenty-one millions two hundred 81. fifty thousand dollars, and the amount that will probably accrue during the present quar- ter, is-estimated at fotir millions two hiniilred and fifty thousand, makihg for the whole year twetity-five millions and a half‘, from which the drawbacks being deducted, will leave a clear rcveiiire from the customs, receivable iii the year I817, ofabuirt twenty iriilliuiis four li'unt,lr'eil thousand dollars, which, with the sums to be received frotn the proceeds of pub- lic [a'dIl(lR, the Batik Dividends, and other in- cidental receipts, will form an aggregate of about twenty-three millions, #1 sum falling sliortofthe whole expenses of the present year, little more than the portion of those i:xpenfllllll'8S applied to the discharge ofthe Public Debt, beyond the annual appropriatioii often millions, by the act of3d March, 1817. Atthe passage of that act, the public Debt amounted to-one hiindreil aird twenty-three millions and a half. On the first ofJanuary next, it will be short ofsevcnty-four millions. In the lapse of these teti years, fifty Iirillions of public debt, with the annual charge ofup- wardsufthree millions ufinterest upon them have been extinguished. At the passatze of that act, ofthe annual appropriation oflltc ten millions, seven were absorbed in the pay- iirent ofinterest,aud not more than three mil- lions went to reduce the capital of the debt. Ofthe same ten millions, at this time scarcely four are applicableto the interest, Stytlptvilrfls of six are effective in melting down-the capi- tal. Yet our experience has proved that a revenue consisting so largely of" impdsts and tflflllilge, ebbs and flows to an-extraoriiiirary extent, with all the fluctuations tncideiit to p within our recollection that even in the can‘;- pass ofthe same lastteti years. the receipts of the Treasury were not adequate to the ex- pendituresof the year ; and in two successive years it was found necessary to resort to loans to meet the engagements of the nation. The returning tides ofthe succeeding years replen- ished the public coffers, until they have again begun to feel the vicissitude ofadecliue. To produce these alterations of fulness and ex- haustion, the relative operation of abundant or of unfiuitful seasons, the regulations of foreign Governments, political revblutions,tlie prosperous or decaying condition of manufac- titres, commercial speculations, and -many Othet CIIIISGS. not always to be traced,variously combine. VVe have found the alternate swells and diminutionsembracing periods offrom two to three years. 'l‘he last period ofde- pression to us was from 1819 to 1829. The corresponding revival was from 1823 to the commencement ofthe present year. Still we‘ have no cause to apprehend a depression,- comparable to that of the former period, or even to anticipate a deficiency which will in--. trench upon the ability to apply the annual ten millions to the reduction ofthe debli It. is well for us, however, to adiiionislietl of the necessity of abiding by the inaxims of the’ most vigilant economy, and ef resorting to alt honorable and use-fu_l expedients, for porsuidg with steady and inflexible persevcraiice the total discharge ofthe debt. Besides the sevenirrillions of the loans of l8l3,which will have been discharged in the course ofthe preseirt year, there are nine mil- lions which,‘ by‘ the terms of the contracts, _would have been, and are now, redeeuiable.—— 'I‘hirteeii millions more of the loan of 1814 will become redeemable now and after the expiration of the present iuoiith; and nitre other millions from and after the close of the ensuing year. They constitute a mass of ilrirty one millions of dollars, all bearing an‘ uteiest of 6 per cent. more than twenty mil- lions of which will be ininfediately redeema-' ble,and the rest within little more than a year. Leaving of this amount fifteen millions to continue at the interest ofsix per cent, but to be as far as shall be foiiud practicable, paid off‘ in the years 1827 antl I828, there is scarcely ii doubt, that the rt.-nraining sixteen millions might, within a few months, be discharged by it loan at not exceeding five per cent. redeem- able in the years 1829 and 1830. By this op- eration, a sum of nearly halfa million dollars may be saved to the nation; &. the discharge ofthe whole thirty one millions witliiir the four years, may-be greatly facilitated, if not wholly accomplished. By an act ofCongress of 3:} March, 1895,21 loan, for the purpose now referred to, ‘or a sirbs_criptiou to stoclr,was autliurizcd, at an iii- teréfi not exceeding four and a half per cent. Biit,at that titne, so large a portion of the floating capital of the country was absorbed in commercial speculations, and so little was left for investmeirt in the stocks,that the meas- rrre was btrt partially successful. At the last session ofCongre.ss, the condition ofthe funds was still uirpropitlous to the measure; bill the change so soon afterwards occurred, that had the authority existed to redeem the iiine'-inil- lions now redeemable by an exchange ofstocks or a loan at five per cent. it is morally certain that it might have been effected, and with H. yearly saving ofirinety thousand dollars. With regard to the collection of revenue, or imposi, certain occurrences. have, within the last year, been disclosed in one or two of our principal ports, which engaged the 8lleIl° tioti of Congress at their last sessl0n,and may hereafter require further consideraiiorr. Until withiir a very few years, the execution of tilt)‘ laws for raising the reveirue, like that ofalt oiir other laws, has been ensured more by the moral sense ofthe coinmunitv,- than by the rigors ofa jealous precaution, or by penai sanctions. Confiding in the exenipl try punc- tuality and unsullied integrity of our iiiiport- ing merchants, a grathral relaxation from the provisions ofthe Collection Laws, :1 close ad - llI:'l’8flC6' to which would have caused incorr- venience anti expense to tlien_i,,lriid long be- come habitual; and indulgenceshad been ex‘- tended universally, because they had never been abiiseil. It may be worthy of your se- gislative provision may not be ireizessaryto come in aid ofthis stateufutigiiardetl SP-‘-‘U“lY- ‘From the -reports herewith corniitunicaied ofthe Secretaries of War and of the Navy, 81. the subsidiary documents auiiexed to them, will be discovered the present couditioii and aditrinistratiou of our Military establishments on the land and on the sea. he orgatrtziv tion of the Army haviirg undergone Ht change since its reduction to the present. Peace Establishment in 18%|, it remains only to observe, that it is -yet found adequate to‘ all the purposes for which a permanent arm- ed force in time of peace can be needed, or useful. It may be proper to add,tliat, froma ilifierence of opinion between the late Presi- dent of the Uirited States and the Senate,-. with‘ regard to the construction of the act ofCpngress offld March, l8-ll, to reduce and fix t,he'Naval Peace Establishment of the U.‘ States,it remains hitherto so far without exe- cution, that no Colonel has been appointed to command one of the Regiments of Artil_lt.-1y.» .~\ supplementary or cxplaiiatory act of ‘the Legislature appears to be the only expedient practicable for removing the difficulty ofthis appointment. lo a period of profound peace, the C,(.lll(ltl(‘E. ofthe inere- military 8S[‘¢ll)llSllll)t‘f|l forms but a very incoiisiderable portion ofthe dtities dc- volving upoti the adiuinistration of the Dc- partnient of War. it .uill be seen by the re- rurrrs from the Departinents ofthe Army, thi.-r. every branch of the service is marked with: order, regularity and discipline. That from‘ the Comi-uautti_irg General through all the gradations of superintcntlcnci-,the otiici.-rs fee-3 themselves to have been citizens before Hit;-' were soldiers, anti that the glory of a lieltullr licau Army iuirst consist in the spirirof free- dom by which it is auirnated, and of patriot- lstll by which it is itnpclletl. ‘It may be con- fidcntly stated, that the moral Cll?ll’i‘tClel' t)flll0.'. Army is in a state of coiriiuuai irnproveitrent. and that all the arrangemeiits for the disposal ofiis parts have a constant reference to that end. But to the War Departiiieitt are attributed other duties, having indeed rclét tion to a future possible condition, of war, but being entirely def'ens'r.ve, and in their tendon.- t:y contributing rather to the security St. p_er-q maireucy of peace: The'erectiou of the for- tifications provideil for by Congress and 8- dapted to secure otir shores front ltusrile iuva.-, .-ion : The distribution of. the fund of public. the general commerce‘ of tbcwvorld,‘ it is graplude and justice to the pcirsipners of.t_lu_a_. / rious consideration, whether some further le- ‘ 3 ‘sh. .» -. .. ‘