Norwalk Chronicler

Norwalk Gazette, Wednesday, January 20, 1819 · page 2

← Back ‹ Prev page Next page ›
n / p pages
j‘ . T_?_,’. - -_ .
._,s,.-3...;-.’* 2 -

.......-...,._,. l _ .

1817’, given him by 12 Indians, partly of,Florida,
and partly of fugitive outlaws from the Unltctl
States. He states that this power, and his in-
structions,_ were to memorialize the British got’-
crnment and the governor general of the H_ava-_
na. These papersare not only substantially
proved, as of his hand writing, on the trial. hut

‘in the daily newspapers of London, of the 24th

and ‘25th of Aug. last, his letter to Nicholls is
published, with a copy of Hambly’s above incu-
tioned letter to him, and a reference to this In-
diaii, power of Attorney to him, ia/1//raved by rlze
commandant of St. xlfurks, F. C. .Lucng0.. An-
other. of the papers is a letter, written in the
name of the same chiefs, by Arbuihnot:10 ‘hf?

governor general of the Havana. askingiof him-

permission fol‘. Arbuthnot to establish a ware-.

house on the Appalachicola ; bitterly and falsely,
complaining that the Americans had macle_set-_
tlements on their lands, within the Spanish lines,_

and calling upon the governor general to give or-
ders to (lisp-.ice them, and sendtliem back to
their own country. In this letter they assign, as
a reason for asking this license for Arbuthnot,
the want of a person to put in writing forjthem
their talks of grievances against the Americans.
And they add, ‘ the commander of the fort of St.
‘Marks had heard all of our talks and complaints.
He approves of what we have done, and what we
are doing ; and it is by his recommendation we
have presumed to address your cxcellency.’, Y ou

-will find these papers in the printed newspaper

enclosed, and to theproceedings of the court mar-
tial, and will point them out to the Spanish gov-
ernment, not only as decisive proofs of the un-
exainpled compliance of.tlie Spanish officers in-
Florida, to foreign intrusive agents and instiga-
tors of Indian hostilities against the U: States,
but as placing beyond a doubt, that participation
of this hostile spirit in the commandant of St.
Marks, which Gen. Jackson so justly complains
of; and of which we have so well founded a right
to demand the punishment. Here is the com-
mandant of a Spanish fort, bound by the sacred
engagement of a treaty to restrain, by force,
the Indians within his command from commit-
ting hostilities against the ‘United States‘, conspi-
ring with those same Indians, and deliberately

gi,-inn» his written approbation to their appoint-.
u D u . - -
ment of a foreigner, a British subject, as tl‘.Clt‘_'

agent, to solicit assistance and supplies from the‘
gbveitiior general of the Havana, and from th_'c
British government, for carrying on these same
hostilities. _

Let us come to the case of Ambi-ister—He
was taken in arms; leading and commanding
the Indians, in the war against the American
troops; and to that charge, upon his trial, plead-
ing guilty. But the primary object of his com-
ing there, wits still more hostile to Spain, than to
the United States. You find that he had told
three of the witnesses, who testified at his trial,
that he had come to this country on Mr. \Vo0d-
bine’s business at Tampa Bay-—to see the Ne-

-‘ -' - ne of them that lie /Hula
gross i_iguted , an 0. a
commission in the Palms: army under ]lfi’cGr(.=go1‘,-
and that he had expected a captaincy. And what
was the intended business of McGregor and
VVoo.dbine at Tampa Bay ? It was the conquest
of Florida from Spain, by the use of thosfi VCVY
Indians and Negroes whom the commandant of

Sl._'lM.aILl&S_\‘v'.':\S .s.o_i'ea;L!-_19_ai.d and SL190?“-in W-’»*’~‘

establishes this fact is contained in the documents
communicated by the President to Congress at
their last session, relatin_t; to the occupation of
Amelia Island by McGregor. From these (loc-
timents you will find, that while McGrcgor was
there, VVoodbine went from New Providence, in
a schooner of his own, to join him : that he arri-
rived at Amelia Island, just as McGregor, aban-
doning the companions of his achievenieut there.
was leaving it ; that lV‘IcGi-egor, quitting the
vessel in which he had embarked at Amelia Isl-
and, went on board that of \Voodbine’s, and re-
turned with him to New Providence : that
‘\Voodbine had persuaded him they could yet ac-
complish the conquest of Florida, with soldiers
to be recruited at Nassau, from the corps of Co-

.lonial Marines, which had served nuclei‘ Nicholls

during the late war '-\.Iill the United States, which
corps had been lately disbanded; and with Ne-

groes to be found at Tampa Bay, and 1500 In-'.

(ll(tIlS, already then engaged to \Voodbine, who
pretended that they had made a grant of all their
lands there to him. Among the papers, the ori-
ginals of which are in our possession, in McGrc-
gor’s own hand writing, instructions for sailing
into Tampa Bay, with the assertion that he cal-
culated to be there by the last of April orfirst of
May, of the present year; aletter dated 27th
Dec. last, to one ofhis acquaintance in this cotiu-
try, disclosing the same intention; and the ex-
tract of a proclamation which was to have been
issued at Tampa Bay, to the inhabitants of Flori-
da, by the person charged with making the settle-
ment there, bcfoi'e his arrival, aiinouncing his
approach, for the purpose of liberating them
from the despotism of Spam, and of enabling
them to form a government for lil'len‘lSt‘lV(‘S. He
had persuaded tnose who would listen to him
there, that his ultimate object was to sell the
Floiidas to the United States. There i-s some
reason to suppose he had made indirect overtures
of a similar nature to the British goveiiimeiit.-—-
This was Ambrister’s business in Florida. He
arrived there in March, the precursor of Me-
Gregor and VVoodbine, and, In‘.n1€(l.'1;ite]y npnn
his arrival, he is found seizing upon Arbuthnot’s
goods, and distributing them among the Ne-
groes and‘ Indians ; seizing upon his vessel, and
compelling its master to pilot him, with a body
ofarmjed Negroes, towards the fortjof St. Marks,
with the declared purpose of taking it by sur-
prise, in the night. \Vriting letters to Gov. Ca-
meron, of New Providence, urgently calling for
supplies of munitions of war, and of cannon, for
the war against the Americans; and letters to
Col. Nicholls,renewing the same demands ofsup-
plies; informing him, that he is with 300 ne-
guocs, ‘ a few of out‘ bluff people,’ who had sluclr
la the cazlsc, and were relying upon the faith of
Nicholls’s promise-.'s._ Our bluff people were the

people of the Negro fort, collected by Nicholls’5
and VVoodbine’s proclamation, during the Amer-
ican and English war;-and the cause to which
they stuck, was the savage, scrvile, extermina-
ting war against the U. States. _
Among the agents and actors of such V|1‘fU0l15
enterprizes as are here unveiled, if was ll’-*'l'(llY
expected that there would be found remarkable
evidences of their respect, confidence and gocfl
faith tov,-'ards one another. Accordingly, bBA5ld_9-"i
the violent seiziire and distribution, by An’1hI‘IS-
ier of Arbuthnot’s property, his letters to Gov.
Cameron and tojNicholls are filled with the dis-
trusts and suspicions of the Indians, that they
were deceived and betrayed by Arbuthnot_;-
while in Arbuthnot's letters to the same Nich-
olls, he accuses VVoodbine of having taken C_hi"‘f%'e
of poor Francis the Prophet, or I-Iilas l-lildjo, up-
on his passage form England to New Providence:
and under pretence of taking care of him and
his affairs—of having defrauded him of a large
portion of the presents which had been delivered
out from tlie king’s stores to him, for Francis’
use. This is one of the passages of Arbuth-
not’s letter to Nicholls, omitmz’ in the publication

-of it last August, in the London newspapers.

Is this narrative of dark and complicated dc-
P,-avity; this creeping and insiduous war, both
against Spain and the United States ;.th1$ 171001?‘
cry of patriotism ; these political pliilters to fu-_
gitive slaves and Indian outlaws ; these perfidics
and treacheries of villains incapable of keeping
their faith even to each other; all in the name
of South‘ American liberty, of the rights of run-
away uegroes, and the wrongs of savage mur-
derers—-all combined and projected to plunder
Spain of her provinces, and to spread massacre
and devastation along the borders of the United
States ? Is all this suflicicnt to cool the sympa-
thies of his Catholic Majesty’s governments €X'
cited by the execution of these two ‘subjects of
a power in amity with the King.’ The Spanish
government is not at this day to be informed that,
cruel as war in its milder forms must ht‘: it lS~
and necessarily must be, doubly cruel; Whtilj W’-\'
ged with savages ; that savages make no prison-
ers, but to torture them ; that they give no quar-
ter; that they put to death without disc-iiinina-
tion of age or sex; that these ordinary charac-
teristics of Indian warfare have been applicable,
in llicil‘ most lieart-sickening horrors, to that war,
left tis by Nicholls, as his legacy, reinstigaterl

‘by \Voodbine, Arbuthnot, and Ambrister, and

stimulated by the approbation, encouragement,
and aid ofthe Spanish commandant at St.Marks.
ls proof i‘cqliil‘e(l ? Intreat the Spanish minister
of state, for a moment, to overcome the feelings
which details like these mtist excite, and to re-
flect, if possible, with composure, upon the facts
S'.f.'i’.:‘(l in the following extracts from the docu-
ments enclosed. v

Letter from sailing master Jairus Loomis to
Commodore Daniel T. Patterson, 13th August,
1816, reporting the destruction of the Negro
fort.

“ On. examining the prisoners, they stated
that Edward Daniels, 0. S. who was made pris-
oner in the boat, on the 17th July, was tarredaizd
burnt? cll.:'1te.”

Letter from Archibald Clarke to Gen. Gaines,
26th Feb. l8l8. ‘(Message of the President
of.tJin,.Ut;-in-.rl R+-v--- “ - * ““"" i‘'‘'“““

‘‘ On the 24th inst. the house of Mr. Garrett-.
rssiciing in the upper part of this county, near
the boundary of VVaync county. (Georgia,) was
attacked (ltii'iiig his absence, near the middle of
the day, by this party, (of Indians) consisting of
about 15, who shot Mrs. Garrett, in two places,
and then dispatched her by stabbing and scalp-
ing. Her two children, one about three years,
and the other two months, were also murdered,
and the eldest scalped: the house was then
plundered of every article of value, and set on
fire.”

Letter from Peter B. Cook, (Aibuthno_t’s
clerk) to Eliza A. Carney, at Nassau, dated Su-
wahnee, l9th Jan. l8l8, giving" an account of
their operations with the Indians, against the A-
mericans, and their massacre of Lieut. Scott and
his party.

, “There was a boat that was taken by the In-
dians, that had in thirty men, seven women, and
four small children. There were six of the men
get clear, and one woman saved, and all ofthe
rest of them got killed. The children were
took by the leg, and their brains (lashed out a-
gainst the boat.” '

If the bare recital of scenes like these connot
be perused without shuddering, what must be
the agonized feelings of those whose wives and
children are, from day to day, and night to night,
exposed to be the victims of the same barbarity ?
I-Iris mercy a voice to plead for the perpetrators
and instigators of deeds like these? -Shouldinq.ui-
ry hereafter be made, why, within three months
after this event, the savage I-Iamathli Micco, up-
on being takeu by the American troops. was, by
order of their commander, immediately hung,
let it be told that that savage was the coni-
mander of the party by which “those women
were butchered, and those helpless infants were
thus dashed against the boat. Contending with
such enemies, although humanity revoltsiat en-
tire retaliation upon them, and spares the lives of
their feeble and defenceless women and childicn,
yet mercy herself surrenders to retributive jus-
tice the lives of their leading warriors taken in
arms-.-ind still more the lives of the foreign,
white iucendiaries, who, disowned by their own
governments, and disowning their own natures,
degrade t_hemselves beneath the savage clia,rac-
ter, by voluntarily descending to its level. Is
not this the dictate of common sense? Is it not
the usage of legitimate warfare? Is it not conso-
nant to thesouudest authorities of national law ?
“ \Vhen at war (says Vattel) with a ferocious na-
tion, which observes no rules and grants no quar-
tcr, they may be chastised in the persons ofthose
o'f them who may be taken; they are of the
number of the guilty ; and by this rigor, the at-
tempt may bc made of bringing them to a sense
of the laws of liuinanity." And again ; “ As a

0..

l

__ ...... ,. .1 1: I‘ -
interference and false

general has the right of sacrificing the lives ‘of
his enemies to his own safety or that of his peo-

ple, if he has to contend with an inhuman ene-

my, often guilty of such excesses, he may take

the lives of some of his p‘risoners, and treat them

as his own people have been treated." The’
justification of these principles is found in their
salutary efficacy, for terror and for example. It

is thus only that the barbarities of Indians can

be successfully encountered. It is thus only

that the worse than Indian barbarities of Europe-

an imposters, pretending authority from their

governments, but always disavowed, can be pun-

ished and arrested. Great Britain yet engages

the alliance and co-operation of sat ages in

war. But her government has invariably. dis-

claimed all countenance or authorization to her

subjects to instigate them against us in time of
peace. Yet so it has happened, that from the peri-

odof our established independence to this day, all

the Indian wars, with which we have been afflict-

e_d, have been distinctly traceable to the instiga-

tion of English traders or agents, always disa-

vowed, yet. always felt, more than once detected,

but never before punished.. Two of them, of-

fenders of the deepest dye, after solemn warning

to their government, and individually to one of
them, have fallen,_/lagranle deliczi-9, into the hands

of an American general ; and the punishment

inflicted upon them has fixed them on high as

an example awful in its exhibition, but, we trust,

auspicious in its results, of that which awaits un-

authorized pretenders of European agency, to

stimulate and interpose in wars between the U-

nited States and the Indians within their con-

troul.

This expositition of the origin, the causes, and
the chaiacter of the war with the Seminole In-
dians and part ofthe Creeks, combined with Mc-
Gregoi-’s mock patriots and Nicholls’s Negroes.
which necessarily led our troops into Florida, and
gave rise to all those incidents of which Mr. Pi-
zarro so vehemently complains, will, it is hoped,
enable you to present other and sounder views
to his Catholic Majesty’s government. It will
enable you to show that the occupation of Pensa-
cola and St. Marks was occasioned neither by a
spirit of hostility to Spain, nor with a view to ex-
tort prematurely, the province from her posses-
sion ’; that it was rendered necessary by the neg-
lect of Spain to perform her engagements ofre-
straining the Indians from hostilities against the
United States, and by the culpable countenance,
encouragement and assistance given to those In-
dians, in their hostilities, by the Spanish govern-
or and commandant at those places : Thatithe
United States have a right to demand, as the
President does demand, of Spain, the punish-
merit of those officers for this misconduct ; and
he further demands of Spain a just and reasona-
ble indemnity to the United States for the heavy
and necessary expenses which they have been
compelled to incur, bythe failure of Spaip to
perform her engagement, to restrain the Indians,

-aggravated by this demonstrated complicity of

her commanding officer's with them, in their hos-
tilities against the United States : Phat the two
Englishmen executed by order of Gen. Jackson

» were not only identified with the savages, with

whom they were carrying on the war against the
United States; but that one of them was the mo-

'- - ----_—- ---Hr-_h. without his
promises to L1... s:..~u....- -2.

support from the British government, never
would have happened-—that the other was the
instrument of war against Spain as well as the
United States, commissioned by McGregor, and
expedited by VVoodbine, upon their project of
conquering Florida with these Indians and ne-
grocs : That, as accomplices of the savages, and
sinning against their better knowledge, worse
than savages, Gen. Jackson, possessed of their
persons and of the proofs of their guilt, might,
by the lawful and ordinary usages of war, have
hung them both without the formality of a trial :
That, to allow them every possible opportunity
of refuting the proofs or of showing any circum-
stance in extenuation of their crimes, he gave
them the benefit of a trial by a court martial, of
highly respectable officers. That the defence
of one, consisted solely and exclusively, of tecl -
nical cavils to the nature of part of the evidence
against him, and the other confessed his guilt.—.-—
Finally, that, in restoring Pensacola, and; St.
Marks to Spain, the President gives the most,sig-
ual proof of his confidence, that hereafter_her
engagement to restrain, by force, the Indians of
Florida from all hostilities against the United
States, will be effectually fulfilled; that there
will be no more murders, no more robberies with-
in our borders, by savages prowling along the
Spanish line, and seeking shelter within it, to
display in their villages the scalps of our women
and children, their victims, and to sell, with
shameless effrontery, the plunder from our citi-
zens in lwpanisli forts and cities; that we shall
bear no more apologies from Spanish governors
and coiumandants, of their inability to perform
the duties of their office and the solemn contracts
of their‘ country—-‘no more excuses for compli-
ances to the savage enemies of the United States
from the dread of their attacks upon themselves
—no more harbouring of foreign imposters, up-
on compulsion ; that a strength sufficient will be
‘kept in the province to restrain thelndians by
force, and officers empowered and instructed to
employ it effectually to maintain the good faith
of the nation, by the effective fulfilment of the
treaty. The duty of this government to pro-
test the persons and property of our fellow citi-
zens on the borders of the United States, is im-
perative——it must be discharged——and if, after all
the warnings that Spain has had—-if after the
prostration of all her territorial rights and neu-
tral obligations, by Nicholls and his banditti, du-
ring war, and of all her treaty stipulations by Ar-
buthnot and Ambrister, abetted by her own com-
manding dlficers, during peace, to the c_ruel an.
noyance of the United States—if the necessities
of self defence should again compel the United
States to take possession of the Spanish forts and
places in Florida, declare, with the_candor and
frankness that bcomc us, that another uncontli~_

\

tional restoration of them most not be expected;

that even the President's. confidence in the good
faith and ultimate justice of the Spanish govern-'

imcnt will yield to the painful experience of con-

tinual disappointment, and that after unwearied
and almost tmnumbered appeals to them, for the
performance of their stipulated duties, in vain,-
_the United States will be reluctantly compelled
to Tel)’: for the protection of their borders, upon“
themselves alone.

You are authorized to communicate the whole‘
of this letter and the accompanying documents-
to the Spanish government. I have the hanor,
&C. &C.‘ .‘

JOHN QUINCY ADAMS,

--—--1-:::-Q9 ®.:;;.1—._._

Congress. .
IN SENATE-—-Jan. 8. A

The Senate resumed theiconsideration of the
bill providing for the erection of a monument o-'
ver the remains of Gen. George I-Vasliington,
where they now fie.

On motion of Mr. Barbour the bill was recom-‘.
mitted, with instructions to report a bill appro-
priating money for the erection of an equcstri‘.m-
statue, of Gen. VVashiugton, in conforrnity with
the resolution of Congress of 1733,

gust, 1783, and directs substantially that an e-;
questrian statue of bronze be erected at the_seat-
ofgovernment ; that the general be represent-
ed in a Roman dress, holding a truncheon in his
right hand, his head encircled with a laurel
wreath ; that the pedestal be of marble on which
to be represented in relief the followi, ,-princi-
pal events of the war in which Gen. VVa __iingt'on
commanded in person, viz. the evacuégion‘ of:
Boston; the capture of the Hessians--aiiwlffrcii-,’
tou; the battle of Princeton ; the action atlMon,.
mouth, and the surrender of York.] '

House or REPRESENTATIVES.

January l2.

Seminole War, E5'c.—The Committee on mili-
tary affairs, to whom was referred that part of the
President’s Message, which relates to the pro-
ceedings of the court martial, in the trial of Ar-
buthnot and Ambrister, and to the conduct ofthe
war against the Seninole Indians, Report :

That after a period of the various documents
submitted to Congress, on the subject ofthe Sem-
inole war, they find much difficulty in separating
the responsibility of the commanding officer, to
his government, from the obligations of the U.
States, to Spain : But, as the occupation and cap-
ture.of Pensacola and St. Marks, are subjects of
negotiation and correspondence at this time be-
tween the two governments, and as the commit-
tee on foreign relations will, probably, consider
this part of the President’s message more imme-
diately connected with their branch of the sub-

this report, to the trial and execution of Alexan-
der Arbuthnot and Robert C. Ambrister. ''

On the 26th April, 1818, a general order issu-
ed at headquarters, fort St. Marks, by Maj. Gen.
Jackson, signed by Col. Robert Butler, adjutant
general, detailing a ‘ special court martial, to
meet at 12-o"clock, A. ‘M. for the purpose of in-
vestigating charges exhibited against A. Arbuth-
not, R. C. Ambrister, and such others who are
can-,'ulaI‘ly situated, as may be brought before it."

Your committee do not deem it necessary to
attach to their report; the proceedings of that
'C0Ul‘ta as every member of the house has been-
furnished with several copies, to which reference-
can be made.

Your committee can find no law of the United
States, authorising atrial, before a military court,
for such offences as are alledged against Arbuth-
not and Ambrister, (except so much of the sec.
0'14 Chat'.9;Cs as charges Arbuthnot with ‘acting
as a spy,’ of which part of the charge the court.
found him ‘ not guilty’) nor in the opinion of your
Commitltiea (1068 any usage authorise,-or exigen-
cy appear, from the documents accompanying
the report of the trial, which can justify me as-
suinption and‘ exercise of power by the court
martial and the" commanding general, on this oc-
casion. It is admitted as a maxim of the law of
nations, that, when the war is with a savage na-
tion which observes no rules, and gives no quar-
ter, we may punish them in the person of any of
their people, whom we may take, (belonging to
the number of them,) and endeavor, by this rig-
orous proceeding, to force them to respect the
laws of humanity. \Vherever severity is not
absolutely necessary, mercy becomes a duty. In
vain has your committee sought among the doc-
uments on the subject of the Seminole war for a
shadow of necessity for the death of the prison-
ers arranged before the court. The war was at
an end. to all intents and purposes—the enemy’s
strong holds had been destroyed——many of them
killed or taken prisoners, and the reinaindcr a
feeble band, dispersed and scattered in <:Vci'y di‘-
rection. The Spanish fort of St. iVIdll£S, which
it was supposed, (and no doubt justly) had pre-
tccted them, was also in our possession, and so
entirely was the war considered to be terminated,
that the Georgia militia under Gen. (Ill-ascock,
had returned to their homes. Then where was
the absolute necessity which alone could tvgirrant
a departure from the exercise of that clemency,
of which the United States has heretofore so just -.
ly boasted 3 '.

Your committee find, in the general order of
the 529th April,-in which Gen. Jackson orders the
execution of Arbuthnot and Ambrister, this re,-
markable reason, intended as a jusiificaiion of
tlle.eX€Clil-10115, principally of Ambrister, but ap-
plying to both Arbuthnot and Ambrister: “ It is
an established principle of the law of nations,
that any individual ofa nation making war against
the citizens of another nation, they being at
peace, forfeits his allegiance and becomes an out-.
law and pirate.” It may be asked by what
system of interpretation the offences charged
could be considered as piracies, which imply, in
common acceptation, offences uponthe high seas,
of which the court could not assume cognizance;

and it is equally cliflicalt to understand the term

[This resolution was passed on’ the 7th of All-".

ject, your committee will confine tl-ieniselves, in .

Loading scan from the Connecticut Digital Archive…
100% · drag to pan, double-click to zoom
page scan