Uncorrected OCR text from the Internet Archive scan — expect misread words and stray characters. Check the original scan before quoting.
" After preaching acceptably to the church for
twenty-five years, Mr. White changed his theological
views, adopting substantially the Sandemanian belief.
He was complained of to the Association in 1763, ' as
holding and teaching false doctrine, and presented to
the council of the Consociation for trial.' The council
met at Danbury Aug. 1, 17ti3. The church {a major-
ity of whom su;;tained Jlr. White) objected to the
authority of the council on the ground that it was a (
Congregational Church, and not amenable to any
outside body. The objection was not allowed ; from
which we may infer that councils in those days (at
least in Connecticut) were something more than 'ad-
visory.' After a five days' session the result reached
was 'that Mr. White should have a three months'
probation to sec if he would not preach to the ac-
ceptance of his hearers.' He did not, however, give
satisfaction, and on Jan. 3, 1764, a joint council of
both the Fairfiehl Consociations met to consider his
case. Mr. White, with a majority of the church, de-
nied the jurisdiction of the council and renounced
the platform ; but the council went forward and found
him guilty of hereby, tad put him on probation again
until the last Tucsdav in March. .\t that time the
council met again and dismissed him from his pastor-
ate under censure. The majority of the church still
adhering to Mr. White, the council recognized the
minority as constituting the First Consoeiated Church
in Danbury, and left the seceding majority to them-
selves'. At the solicitation of Mr. White the council
convened again the following September to state upon
what terms he could be relieved from censure. Tin
terms given were declined by Mr. White, and he wa~
never restored to fellowship.
"The seceding party, declaring themselves inde-
pendent of Consociation, formed a new church organ-
ization, which received the name of the ' New Dan-
bury Church.' Retaining Mr. White as piu^tor, they
built a meeting-house in 1768, which nine years later
was burned by the British. The church was greatly
weakened by the loss of their meeting-house and by
defections to the Sandemanians, am(mg which wa.-^
that of Rev. Ebenezer Russell White (son of Rev.
Ebenezer White), who in 1768 had become colleague
pastor with his father. In 1779, Rev. Ebenezer
White died, and shortly thereafter the 'New Danbury
Church' became extinct.
" The name White has been a prominent and hon-
I orcd name in Danburv for the last century, the line
of Rev. Ebenezer White's descendants having been
continuous to the present, and finding its representa-
tives in Danbury to-day in the families of Mr. Wil-
liam R. White, Mr. Thilo White, and Col. Nelson L.
White.
" This church, weakened by the secession of a ma-
jority of its members, did not secure another pastor
after the dismi.ssion of Mr. White until two years
had elapsed. In February, 1765, Mr. Noadiah A\'ar-
ner was ordained pastor, but his pastorate was brief
and much interrupted by efibrts that were made to
secure the return of the .seceders, he on two occjusion-
consenting to relinquish his pulpit for several month-
that candidates might be listened to by both partie-.
it being understood that if a man was found upon
whom all coubl unite Jlr. Warner would resign in his
favor. Variances about pecuniary matters and a lack
of the spirit of concession thwarted these efl'orts, bni
I they disturbed the relations of Mr. Warner to thr
church to the extent that he sought a dismission at
the expiration of the third year of his pastorate.
" From the sociiiy records, which date back to 1 75.'),
it appears that on April 3, 1760. a call to the pa.«torati'
was given by the church and society to 'the worthy
Jeremiah Day,' who had for a few weeks supplie<l th''
pulpit, but, the vote of the society standing twenty-
eight opposed to the call to forty-seven in favor, and
the vote to give him a yearly salary of seventy-five
pounds, with a settlement of one hundred and fifty
pounds standing forty-six in favor, opjxised forty-
three, he did not accept. Doubtless this ri'sult seemed
disappointing at the time, but Providence w;l< not
altogether unkind, as by his brief connection with
the church he gained for himself a wife, he being
DANBURY.
219
married the following yenr to Jliss Luey AVood, one
of the young-lady members of the ehureh.
"In the summer of 1770, Mr. Ebenezer Baldwin
accepted a call to the church. The earliest reeonls of
the church in existence begin with the minutes of the
council that convened for his settlement, Sept. 19,
1770. The sermon upon the occasion was j)reached
by President Daggett, of Yale College. The brief
statement of Eobbins' sermon respecting Mr. Bald-
win is that "he officiated with great reputation to the
ministry till a sudden death terminated his labors,
Oct. 15, 177(3, — a man of great talents and learning'
(he was the second scholar of his class in college), 'a
constant student, grave in his manners, a constant
and able supporter of the sound doctrines of the gos-
pel.' (After the defection of Jlr. White, xoiiiidiirs-'i in
the faith would beyond question be the first ijnalifica-
tion demanded in a pastor.) During his ministry of
six years there were added to the full eommuuion of
the church lifty-four. Ten were admitted to tlie half-
way covenant.
" The practice of the churches of that day was to
allow baptiz.ed persons who did not profess conversion
to assent to the church covenant, which act brought
them into connection witli and under the jurisiliction
of the church, although they did not join in com-
munion.
"Mr. Baldwin married sixty-eight eoupk's. He
baptized one liuiidred and thirteen eliildren, and
attended one hundred and lorty-nine Ihiierals. The
summer of 177o was a period of great mortality in
Danbury, and of the one hundred and tliirty deaths
in town that year eighty-two were within the limits
of the First Society, and sixty-two funerals were
I attended by Mr. Baldwin in the three months of
j June, July, and August.
, "The pastorate of Mr. Baldwin covered those
! exciting years in the national history that preee<led
and marked the commencement of the Revolution.
At that day no class of citizens was more conspicuous
for patriotism, or more powerfully contributed to
arouse the spirit of resistance to the despotic acts
of the British government and to prcjiare the minds
of the people for the great struggle of the Revolution,
than the Congregational clergy of New England, and
among them Mr. Baldwin was conspicuous by his zeal
: and signal ability. Almost all the writing for the
; public prints at that day was done by the clergy.
In 1774 he prepared and published a spirited address
[to the people of the western ])art of the colony to
arouse them to a sense of the danger in which their
liberties were involved. In November, 1776, on the
day set apart for Thanksgiving in the colony of Con-
necticut, at a period which he regarded as the most
calamitous the British colonies ever beheld, he
preached a sermon designed to wake up the spirits
lof the people in the important and dangerous strug-
igle in which they were engaged. This sermon had
at the time great celebrity. So excellent, encouraging,
and appropriate was it that it was called for and
l)rinted at the expense of a leading member of the
Episcopal Church. A coi>y of it is preserved in the
archives of tlie New York Historical Society. Mr.
Baldwin, with the other ministers of tlie Association,
arranged a series of circular fasts in the churches rif
Fairfield County, in the spring of 177ii, on 'account
of the threatening aspect of the jiuldic affairs.'