← LibraryFarewell to the First Congregational Church in Norwalk, Conn. (bound with other addresses)
Uncorrected OCR text from the Internet Archive scan — expect misread words and stray characters. Check the original scan before quoting.
THE GENERAL ASSOCIATION OF CONNECTICUT.
NEW YORK :
PRINTED FOB THE ASSOCIATION OF FAIRFIELD WEST,
BY BAKER, GODWIN & CO.
Tribnn* Buildings, oppoiite City Hall.
1852.
EXTRACTS
FROM THE
.MINUTES OF THE ASSOCIATION OF FAIRFIELD WEST.
^ ^^^
Anmeal Meeting, Fairfield, May 27, 1851. — " The letter
of Hartford Central Association to this body, dated May 20,
1851, was read and referred to a committee, consisting of
Messrs. T. Smith, L.BE. Atwater, and S. B. S. Bissell."
Adjowrned MeeUng at New Camaan^ July 1, 1S51. — " The
committee to wh6m the last communication from the Hart-
ford Central Association had been referred, made a report in
part, and were continued to report at an adjourned meeting.
Dr. Hall was added to the committee."
Adjourned Meeting at North Stamford, Oct. 15, 1851. —
"The committee to 'jrhom the last communication of the
Hartford Central Association had been referred, made a
report in part."
Adjourned' Meetmg at Fairfield, Nov. 4, 1851. — "The
committee to whom the last communication from the Hart-
ford Central Association had been referred, completed their
report. Voted that the report be accepted."
Adjourned M&eting, Norwalh, Deo. 2, 1851. — " Were
present, Kev. Elders, M. Mead, S. Haight, H. Fuller, 0.
Bentley, E. D. Kinney, E. Hall, D.D., T. Smith, S. B. S. Bis-
sell, T. B. Stui^ges, I. Jennings, C. Clarkj A. B. Kich, Gordon
Hall, "W. J. Jennings, and B. B. Beardsley. Heard that
?art of the report which relates to Dr. BushnelVs Views.on
HE Atonement, as expressed in his book entitled ' Christ in
TkEOLOGT.' All the passages referred to, were read from the
book, and full time was allowed for comments thereon by
members of the Association. Voted, that the part of the
report which has b.een read at this session, be approved and
adopted."
Adjoined Meeting at Stamford, Deo. 16, 1851. — " "Were
E resent, Eev. Elders, M. Mead, S. Haight, H. Fuller, J. H.
.insley, D.D., 0. Bentley, E. Hall, D.D., T. Smith, L. H.
Atwater, D.D., S. B. S. Bissell, I. Jennings, A. B. Kich, and
W. J. Jennings. Heard that part ot the report which
relates to Dr. BushneWs Views on The Tbinitt, and The
Inoaenation, as expressed in his book entitled ' Christ in
Theology ;' also that part which relates to his views on
SEVEEAL coLLATEEAii SUBJECTS, as exprcssed in his books,
'God in Cheist,' and ' Cheist in Theology.' Voted unani-
mously, to adopt the parts of the report which have just been
read. Also heard that part of the report whicb replies to
the pamphlet of ' C. C.,' and voted to adopt the same, with
a view to its being printed as an Appendix."
Adjova-ned Meeting at Easton, Dec. 30, 1851. — " Voted
that the introduction and conclusion of the report be recom-
mitted to the same committee." . .
Ad^owfned Meeting at N'orwalk, FA> 3, 1852. — " "Were
present. Rev. Elders, S. Haight^ H. Fuller, J. H. Linsley,
I).D., E. D. Kinney, E. Hall, D.D., T. Smith, L. H. Atwater,
D.D., C. T. Prentice, S. B. S. Bissell, Z. B, Burr, I. Jennings,
S. J. M. Merwin, Gordon Hall,, and Martin Dudley. The
committee to whom the introductory and concluding parts of
the report had been referred, reported an introduction and
conclusion. Voted, to accept this report. Voted, to adopt
this report. Voted, that the w^hole repbrt, the several parts
of which have been adopted by this body, at its meetings,
December 2d, and December 16th, 1851, and at this present
meeting, be printed, and a copy thereof sent to each of the
Associated Ministers in the State ; and that the committee
who prepared the report, superintend its publication and dis-
tribution."
The foregoing are true extracts from the Minutes of the
Association.
Attest Theophilus Smith, Eegister.
APPEAL
OF
THE ASSOCIATION OF TAIEFIELD WEST,
c6j? 7l<p'i^L
ASSOCIATED MINISTERS CONNECTED WITH THE GENERAL
ASSOCIATION or CONNECTICUT ■-
Dea/r Brethren : — In Octoter, 1849, the Hartford Central
Association adopted and published a minute, respecting the
sentiments of Dr. Bushnell, as expressed in his book entitled
" God m Cheist," in which the following sentences occur :
" We are satisfied, that whatever errors the book may contain, it furnishes
no sufficient ground for instituting a judicial process with him."
" We regret his departure, in some of his statements, from the formulas of the
church. We adhere to these formulas; but we regard him, notwithstanding the
exceptions which he has taken to them, as holding whatever is essential to
the scheme of doctrine which they embody."
"He could not, in our view, be, properly or justly subjected to the charge of
heresy, and a consequent trial, or be denied the confidence of his brethren in
the ministry."
In January, 1850, we addressed a remonstrance to the
Hartford Central Association, against their decision in the
forementioned minute, setting forth the errors contained in
Dr. Bushnell's book, and earnestly requesting them to recon-
sider the case, and reverse their proceedings.
In March, 1850, the Hartford Central Association made a
brief reply to our remonstrance, declining to reverse their pro-
ceedings, or even reconsider. the case, but making no reply to
the several allegations contained in our remonstrance.
We then sent to you copies of our remonstrance and of
their reply, and requested you to meet and consider the case,
and let us know the conclusion to which you might come.
After receiving answers from nearly all the district asso-
ciations, we addressed the following
Memoeial to the Geneeal Association of Connectioitt.
The memorial of the Association of Fairfield West to the General Associa-
tion of Connecticut, at its meeting at Litchfield, in Jime, 1850, respectfully
sheweth, '
That by the appointment of your body at its meeting at Hartford, June,
6
1848, Rev. Horace BushneU, D. D., a member of the Hartford Central Associar
tion, preached to the ministers of this State, a di^oOTse Upon the Divinity of
Christ, at New Haven, on the TiieBday preceding the commencement in Yale
College for that year : , .
That at the time of its delivery, the said discourse was understood, by
many ministers who heard it, to deny the orthodox, doctrine of the Trinity ; or,
that the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost," are three distinct, coS(iual and coeternal
persons in the one substance of the Godhead :
That early in the year 1849, Dr. Bushnell, in a volume entitled 'God in
Cheist,' published said discourse, with the addition of two others from the same
text (eafli of which had been delivered to large assemblies of ministers in Mass-
achusetts), which present in greater detail and explioitness the scheme of doc-
trine partially developed in the first discourse ; and are, in fact, but the expan-
sion and completion of it:
That said volume in this manner bearing in some degree ihe sanction of
your body, so long as you are silent in regard to it, has been deemed and de-
clared, by vast numbers of ministers and intelligent laymen, including numerous
accredited public teachers of theology in our own and other evangelical com-
munions, to deny and impugn various cardinal doctrines pf the Gospel, particu'
larly the Trdutt, the Incarnation, the Atonement, and Justification by FAinr,.
as tiiese are held in evangelical churches :
That the Hartford Central Association, in view of the cha,rges of false do(J-
trine thus "brought against the book from various quarters, instituted an investi-
gation of the case, which resulted in their finding, and- publishing to the world,
that its author holds whatever is essential to the scheme eotitained in the formu-
las of the church, and that 'he could not properly or justly be subjected to the
charge of heresy and a consequent trial, or be denied the confidence of his
brethren in the ministry,' as by their published report fully appears:
That, since the book itself eontams the whole subject matter of the heresy
charged, other associations have the same means of judging of the sentiments
thus pronounced to be not beretical, which the Hartford 'Central Association
have ; and consequently, the question between that, body , and those who
except to their decision, is a question as to what are , fumdawiental doctrines and
fundamental errors — what constitutes the essence of the Gospel; and that this is
the real question, at the bottom of all others now agitating the ministers and
churches in connection with this painful subject :
That the Association of Fairfield West, grieved with the aforesaid decision
in common with multitudes throughout the State and land, having first ascer-
tained by private correspondence that there was no prospect that the Hartford
Central Association would, ' of its own motion, re-consider said decision, ad-
dressed to that body its Remonstrance and Complaint against said decision,
pointing out various heresies which, in their view, the said book contained,
with the proofs of the same, and on this ground entreating the Hartford Central
Association to review their action in tie case ; and that, in answer to said re-
monstrance, the Hartford Central Association wholly refused to re-eonsider their
decision, imless new evidence of a decisive character should be presented;
copies of which Remonstrance and Answer are herewith submitted :
That, hereupon, we printed said Complaint a.ud Answer, and sent a copy
thereof to each minister in the State, and a circular letter to each District Asso-
ciation, requesting them severally " to meet and consider the subject and let us
know the conclusion to which they might come :"
That we have already received answers from several of our sister Associa-
tions, copies of which are herewith submitted ; somBjOf which declare explicitly
the opinion, that the errors of the book are fvmdaiMntal, and that if they
receive express ecclesiastical allowance in our State, then a good standing in the
ministry among us cannot and ought not to be deemed eY&n prima facie evidence
of soundness in the faith ; and others say that the book has made such an im-
pression aa to fiurnish occasion for putting its author on trial before the proper
tribunal