Uncorrected OCR text from the Internet Archive scan — expect misread words and stray characters. Check the original scan before quoting.
Benjamin
married
Juliet Bouton.*
Eliza Weed.
William.
James M.*
James M. married
Cornelia M. Downs.
Esther Bouton* / Seth Williston
married ( married
Nathaniel Benedict.'^ \ Fanny R. Benedict.
Sally Bouton
married
Nehemiah Raymond.'
Seth Seymour.
Emily
married
Joh7t. Hudson.
Fanny.*
Julia. ■*'
Maria.
Catharine.
Eliza.
William.
Emily.
Susan.
John and 2 more.
Ann.
Eliza.
Fanny.
John.
Julia Ann.
William.*
William.
Benjamin.
Emeline.
Cornelia.
Harriet.
John.
< James Marion.*
r Louisa
married
Legra-nd Lockwood.
Charles Williston
married
Jane McAlpin.
James Hoyt.
Sarah Esther.*
Sarah Francis.
Emma Jane,
f Marg't(see J.Bouton)
Sarah Ann married
Gillmore.
I John.
I Julia.
I Susan
I Banks.
1 Wilbur.
Mary.
i Harvey.
(. Emily.
Fifth Generation
Le Grand.
Williston Benedict
Rosweli Ebenezer;
\ Charles
GENEALOGICAL REGISTER,
307
Second Generation.
Clara Bouton*
married
Isaac Russ.
Third Generation
Isaac Edwin.
Isaac Edwin,
William *
Martha.
John.*
Susan Ann
Harriet.*
Seth Bouton* married <; Raymond.
Asenath Raymond.
I
Joseph Bouton
married
Betty Bixbee.
Susannah Bouton
married
Samuel G. Waring.
John Bouton
married
Hannah Betts^
Betsey Chichester.
Mary Bouton
married
Henry Banta^
Christopher Gtoyer^
Samuel Raymo^id*
Anna Bouton
married
Horatio N. Downs.
Nathani«i Bouion
married
Harriet Shermati.'^
Man/ Ann P. Bell*
E. A. Vaiey.
\ Mary Esther.
Juliet*
Fanny.*
Fanny Esther marri
Valentine Merrills.
Amanda married
John Dibble.
Joseph married
William.
.JSTathanisL
William married
Margaret Hudson,
Mary.*
Clarissa
married
Nathan Nash^
John.
Elizabeth.
Sarah Esther.
Hannah Harriet.
/ Susan Banta*
married
William '-rhomae.
Eliza Banta married
Linus Scvdder,
John Banta
married
William Gwyer.
Mary Gwyer married
Daniel Toionsend.
Ann."^
{Harriet Newell.*
Charles Algernon.
Harriet Angenora.
Cornelia Marion.^
(see Benjamin Reed.
Elizabeth Ripley.
Nathaniel Sherman.
John Bell.
Harriet Sherman.
Mary Ann Peris.
Samuel Fletcher.
Christopher,
and 3 more.
Fourth Generation.
4 -children.
4 children,
r Elizabeth.
I Joseph.
«! Charles Edgar.
I Albert Bouton.
[ Emma Louisa,
t Melissa Amanda.
I Julia Frances.
) Homer Arlington.
r Emily,
j Julia.
] Le Roy
[ John.
Clarissa Ann
C Josephine;
< Virginia.
t Augusta.
f Emma.*
j Susan.
j George Heniy-
[ Linus Melville.
f William Henry..
/ Cornelia.
I Leonora.
Charles
308 JSrORWALK.
APPENDIX B, pp. 184, 5.
GENEALOGY OF THE BENEDICT FAMILY.
[In the year 1755, Dea. James Benedict, of Ridgefield, grand-
son of Thomas Benedict, sen., of Norwalk, wrote a genealogy of
the family, from which, and from a manuscript prepared by Eras-
Tus C. Benedict, Esq., of New York, a descendant of James, the
leading facts relating to the first six generations have been derived,
Dea. James Benedict learned the particulars he gives of the
early history of the family, down to his own[memory, from his grand-
mother, Mary Bridgum, the wife of Thomas Benedict, sen., with
whom he lived in his youth. In 1768 this record was copied by
his grandson, Rev. Abner Benedict, while a member of Yale
College, and by him sent to Thomas Benedict, of Norwalk. Other
copies have been made for other branches of the family.
The record here given is confined to a single line, viz.: 1.
The children of Thomas, sen. 2. The children of John, his 2d son.
3. The children of his grandsons," John and James*. 4, Of his great
grandson, Nathaniel. 5. Of Nathaniel 2d, his fifth descendant;
and Gth, of Nathaniel 3d, the sixth descendant; which brings it
down to the present generation, and to" the writer of this intro-
ductory note. Were the descendants of each of the children and
grandchildren to be traced and^recorded the list would make a vol-
ume of itself. " S. W. B.j
FIRST GENERATION.
William Benedict, is the first of the family of whom any
trace has been found. Tradition says that he resided in Not-
tinghamshire, England, about the year 1500, and that he was
the only son of his father. He had also but one son, who was
also called William.
SECOND GENERATION.
William Benedict, who also resided in Nottinghamshire,
and had an only son, also called William.
THIRD GENERATION.
William Benedict, who also resided in Nottinghamshire,
lie also had an only son, who was named Thomas.
* See Appendix C, p. 330.
GENEALOGICAL REGISTER. 309
FOURTH GENERATION.
Thomas Benedict and Mary Bridgum, his wife.
He was born in England, 1617. He was an only son, and
when he left England, tradition says, the name had been con-
fined to only sons for more than one hundred years, and that
he did not know another person of the name in existence;
from which it would seem that his father was then dead. He
lost his mother early, and was put apprentice to' a weaver
during his minority. His father married a second wife, who
M'as a widow, a Mrs. Bridgum, who had a daughter named
Mary Bridgum. When Thomas became of age (1638), he
^nd Mary Bridgum came to New England in the same vessel,
and first settled in '' The Massachusetts Bay." Not long after
"the said Thomas Benedict was joined in marriage with
said Mary Bridgum, and from these have arisen a numerous
offspring" — the Benedicts in America.
They lived some time in the Massachusetts Bay, and then
removed to Southold, Long Island, where their children were
born — five sons and four daughters — Thomas, John, Samuel,
Jj^MES, Daniel, Betty, Mary, Sarah, Rebecca. From
Soathold they removed to Huntington, where they re-
sided several 5'-ears. Thej^ were residing there in June, 1656.
They removed thence to Jamaica, on the same Island, where
Thomas, the eldest son, married Mary Messenger of that place.
The eastern part of Long Island being at that time
considered a part of Connecticut was of course principally set-
tled by the English pilgrims, who gradually extended them-
selves westward, and rather encroached upon their Dutch
neighbors of New York, with whom they were not much dis-
posed to coalesce. The Long Island settlements (except the
extreme west), were principally English, and when on the
27th August, 1664, the Dutch Governor, Stuyvesant, capitulat-
ed to Col. Richard Nichols, the change of government was
highly acceptable to the English settlers, and they immediate-
ly set about extending their settlements. On the 26th Sep-
tember in the same year, John Bailey, Daniel Denton, and
Thomas Benedict, and others, made a written application to
Col. Nichols for liberty to settle a plantation upon the river
14* '
310 'NORWALK„
called Arthur-Cull Bay, in New Jersey. On the 30th of the
same month he granted the petition and promised encourage-
ment That place is now Elizabethtown. The principal pe-
titioners were in Jamaica in 1665, It is therefore to be pre-
sumed that they sent out a colony.
Governor Nichols issued " To the magistrates of the several
tounes upon Longisland," an order of election, dated James
ffort, in New York, 8th February, 1664, reciting that the in-
habitants had for a long time groaned under many grievous
inconveniences and discouragements occasioned partly from
their opposition to a foreign power, in which distracted con-
dition few or no laws could be put in due execution, bounds
and titles to lands disputed, civil liberties interrupted, and
from this general confusion private dissentions and animosi-
ties had too much prevailed against neighborly love and
Christian charity, and in discharge of his duty" to settle good
and known laws," requiring two deputies to " a general meet-
ing," to be chosen from each town " by the major part of the
freemen," and recommending " the choice of the most sober,
able and discreet persons, without partiality or faction," to
meet '* on the last day of February at Hempstead." The del-
egates from Jamaica were Daniel Denton and Thomas Bene-
dict. This is believed to be the first English legislative body
ever convened in New York,
In 1665, he was commissioned by Gov. Nichols as a Lieu-
tenant " of the Foot Company of Jamaica." His commission
was dated at " Fort James in New York, the 7th day of April,
1665." Whether he accepted the commission is not known.
It is certain, however, that he did not hold it long, as during
the same year he removed from the State to Norwalk, in the
Colony of Connecticut, with all his family. There they
lived together, and thence they scattered abroad in little colo-
nizing parties to let in the light on other parts of the neighbor-
ing wilderness, or to swell the numbers of the pioneer bands
who had already planted settlements in the vicinity.
In 1666, February 19lh, he was chosen town cierk and se-
lectman of Norwalk
GENEALOGICAL REGISTER. 311
In 1669 he was again chosen town clerk, and the list of
freemen of Norwalk contains his name as one of 42 of which
the list was composed Oct. 13, 1669. In 1672 he was again
chosen town clerk, and held the office for many years after-
wards. The records, in his own hand writing, are still pre-
served and are legible, properly attested by his own signature,
a fac simile of which, as here given, it may also be interest-
ing to preserve.
This primitive pilgrim pair are thus described in the manu-
script of Dea. James Benedict already referred to :
" They walked in the midst of their house with a per-
fect heart. They were strict observers of the Lord's
day from even to even. It may be said of them as it was of
Zachariah and Elizabeth, that the}'" walked in all the com-
mandments and ordinances of the Lord blameless, and obtained
a good report through faith. Their excellent example had a
good effect through the blessing of God upon their children.
He was made a deacon of the church in Norwalk, and used
that office to good satisfaction of that church to his death,
which was in the year of our Lord 1690, in the seventy-third
year of his age, and was succeeded in his office as deacon by
two of his sons, viz. John and Samuel, who used that office
until old age and its attendants rendered them unable to serve ;
and there are at this time seven of the family and name which
use the office of a deacon, and I trust some of them, at least,
to good acceptance both to God and man," His wife sur-
vived him and lived to the age of one hundred years.